Friday, January 9, 2009

Wall Street wives leave but money is men's saving grace

Men must remember that our biological worth can be changed by hard work and women are stuck with their inherent biological value that fades with age. I feel empowered that if I work hard enough I can have a beautiful woman that loves me even if she does not know it is for my status and resources. This is a two way street as many high status males change up their wives for younger ones as well. Ultimately this is a man's saving grace. BUT it must be remembered that no matter what women do they will always be taken care of even if they leave us.

Alimony is based on what type of living a man can provide and not providing for a median standard of living. Feminists seek rights for women without asking them to bear responsibility for those rights. The premise of feminism is to eliminate risk to women and give them choices men do not have. To be independent or choose to lean on men, to stay home or work. Meanwhile they are not seeking to help families but see it as the "wife problem" "child problem" and marriage as a prison instead of lobbying for family leave rights they lobby for more money with false allegations of pay discrimination. (See 76cents for every dollar).

Men in many states must pay woman support for the rest of their lives. (see alimony). Smart men get a prenuptial agreement signed that makes it more fair and allows him the ability to find another women and perhaps help support another family and to not loose his dear children. Some men get screwed so bad they can't even pay to date other women. Who knows a man could get lucky and find a woman that makes more than him and maybe maybe get alimony if they divorce. I know that this is most likely not the norm as women always find men that make as much and ideally more than they do. Quite frankly I believe men look for women that make the same or less. This is evolutionary preference in action. (See my blog on alimony.)

ARTICLE:Wall Street wives leave:

New York, July 11 (ANI): Though lack of money is not yet deemed to be a legitimate reason for divorce in the US, the credit crunch and economic downturn over the past one year has resulted in the increase of divorce cases here, especially among the super-wealthy in New Yorks Wall Street area.

The latest trend, noticed over the past one year has been couples with ten million dollars or more in assets suing for divorce due to the credit crunch and depleting bank balances or net worth.

One New York divorce lawyer said that one of his clients was worried that his wife would leave him if she found out that his net worth had fallen from 20 million to 8 million dollars after he suffered huge losses on property and other investments. To keep his wife, he was trying to mask his declining fortune by borrowing to pay for her clothes and holidays, The Times quoted him as saying.

Raoul Felder, the New York lawyer who represented Larry Fortensky in his divorce from Elizabeth Taylor, and who exclusively represents the very rich class, said that his companys caseload had soared from 250 to 300 in the past year.

This is the biggest jump since 1980, when New York state law was changed, adding four new grounds for divorce to the sole existing one - adultery. Under the revised New York law, couples can sue for divorce on the grounds of - cruel and inhuman treatment; abandonment; prison for three or more years; and separation for at least one year.

Felder, who represented Rudolph Giuliani, the former mayor of New York in his recent divorce, and Mike Tyson’’s former wife Robin Given in hers, said: Money’’s really all that it’’s about, the husbands know it, but the wives will never say it.

Kenneth Mueller, a pyschotherapist in the East Village area of New York , who works with many Wall Street bankers and property magnates, said: The credit crunch is starting to become a really big issue - especially for the moneyed classes. Once you can”t act out with money you start fighting. It’’s like drinking, or gambling, or sexing your way out of feelings, but with a fabulous family vacation or great clothes or wonderful meals money can become an addiction that masks the reality. When that goes, reality has to be faced and accusations start flying.

Nancy Chemtob, another New York divorce lawyer, said that since November she has been receiving a couple of inquiries a week relating to divorce cases motivated by the credit crunch, compared with virtually none before. (ANI)

>> REGARDLESS I AM HOPING TO FIND A WOMAN SOMEDAY THAT WILL LOVE ME. THE GOOD THING ABOUT MY WORK IS THAT I CAN KEEP STUDYING. I THINK WITH ALL THE WOMEN OUT THERE MAKING MONEY MAKES MY HOPES DIFFICULT. I AM VERY CLOSE TO MAKING MORE THAN THE AVERAGE WOMAN WHICH WILL BE A GOD SEND. THE WAY I SEE IT, I HAVE NO CHOICE REALLY, THIS IS WHAT WOMEN REQUIRE OF ME. I'VE GOTTA OUT DO THEM!<<

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Why pretty women should be nurturing and caring when she has that much men wanting to provide for her.

There is no caring, loving in this relationships. It is business.

That is why they get changed for younger ones later.

Powerful men do not need nurturing. They want competition and to win regardless of women. They are not doing it in order to win most beautiful women. Because they do not stop when they get one or two. The competition is drug for them.

Women are narcissist and materialistic creatures. And are never going to appreciate the long way to power you made only to get them and satisfy them.

Powerful men treat beautiful women like dirt because there is no soul inside beautiful women. Only snake craving more power through men. I do not know any beautiful women with nurturing capacity. I simply do not know any young women with capacity for compassion towards other people than themselves.

Some women feel compassion and find out they are not the center of universe only after childbirth and some just never. It is very false to assume that only feminists are like that and beautiful women mean endless caring, beautiful, nurturing soul.