Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Feminist Theory

video

The text extract below from a feminist website correlates with the video created by Men's Rights Activists above. Chance, I don't think so, there is little dialog with N.O.W. & women's groups and Men's Rights groups that are now trying to form ranks but both sides have made their views known and men increasingly are making a voice for ourselves, to defend ourselves and young boys.

Though the extract below comes from a radical gender feminist website I find they are less reserved and more likely to feel free to use such outspoken dialog. I use this to serve as a base of exemplification to create contrast and facilitate my observation of real world patterns and activity, A kind of amplification that allows me to see the implemented subtleties that extend from the extreme base of this ideological archetype. The true implementation in our culture is somewhere in the middle but often times the extreme. You will see then how it correlates then with the video issued by mens rights group above, my own experiences in my Women's Studies class, and the school psychologist from Men4Change below. This woman is a radical but what she speaks of in our schools is very real. She also recruits women trained in psychology from prestigious institutions for her own abusive purpose to capitalize on the results of ill male socialization. Please do not delve to far into her site at this time. IT IS SO IMPORTANT TO ME THAT PEOPLE HEAR MY MESSAGE. PLEASE READ MY BLOG. The link to her site will be posted later on..

Feminist doctrine extract:
"Society has been trying to develop a model where these men can be reached when they are children and thus re-programmed to be submissive and not aggressive. There are all kinds of pilot programs in schools (most developed my feminists) to teach young boys to be less aggressive. Most of these programs fail because being aggressive is a part of being a boy. But if these boys can be taught and encouraged to be submissive to the female gender and to view the female gender with respect and admiration, studies show they stand a great chance of growing up to be law abiding and less violent."

All competitive learning has been entirely replaced with cooperative learning models designed for girls only.
Even recess has been taken away in some U.S. schools and when there is recess competitive sports are not allowed for legal and liability issues all boys can not play dodge ball. An increasingly large amount of boys are diagnosed with Hyperactivity Disorder or ADD ADHD and placed on drugs like Ritalin. Boys are shamed and discouraged every where they turn.

It is this type of socialization of boys that leads to the below statements of boys in the image below which you will view in a moment. Ironically enough the image below comes from a pro feminist website and the author exclaims that these feeling of boys come from ill conceived notions by boys of the true purpose of feminism and as such they are holding on to a masculine identity that leads to these feelings. Indeed he suggests feminism is here to help these boys. He explains that the commonly accepted paradigm of young boys developing by separation of his identity of the mother when he begins to associate himself first as a separate individual and then as boy or girl is not necessary. What he is suggesting if you notice is that this bond or disconnect from the feminine need not take place. Let me make clear that the larger psychological community understands that masculine identity is indeed formed by relation to the existing masculine and males around him. The combination of isolation of the male from his father,sole mother authority, sole female authority in schools along with the implementation of adverse socialization techniques in schools has grave consequences for the development of boys. (THIS MAN IS IN OUR SCHOOLS ON A DAILY BASIS AT THIS VERY MOMENT I MIND YOU! AND IS A MEMBER OF WHAT IS CALLED MEN4CHANGE)

See the image below to see how this socialization process is enacted and the reactionary statements of boys. He is making the suggestion that these statements from boys stem from not aligning with the feminine or what he calls
insufficient relational-ization to the feminine. You will also see how he proclaims
the development of masculine identity as a social construct stating "pressures in culture demand that a little boy disconnect from relational socialization from the mother" Those briefed in modern psychology know that it is not a social construct that causes this in a boy and no where do we say "disconnect from your mother young man" Little boys naturally yearn to connect with the masculine and adult males. This is imperative to proper male development. If you are a trained psychologist or psychiatrist IT IS YOUR DUTY to help the Men's Rights movement and pass this information to your colleagues. The socialization of boys has been ignored for to long. Boys are shamed and socialized to view themselves in a horrible way from a very young age.
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/CommunitySupport/Men4Change/notpoofs.html



The below link contains more theory on why feminists believe that males should not form identity from the masculine and should be shielded from it. This same ideology is taught in schools which you can see from the Men-4-Change group above.

http://www.womanthouartgod.com/femmontagu.php

AND NOW I ASK YOU TO PLEASE LOOK AT THE STATEMENTS BY WHAT THE PRO FEMINIST MAN STATES ON HIS WEBSITE IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONSENSUS OF 8TH GRADE BOYS FEELINGS AND SEE HOW IT LEADS TO FURTHER SUBJUGATION TO THE FEMALE IN ADULT LIFE BY READING AN EXCERPT FROM A FEMALE SUPREMACIST WEBSITE BELOW. THIS PSYCHOANALYSIS OF THIS TRAINED PSYCHOLOGIST AND FEMINIST WAS DEVELOPED TO GET INSIDE THE HEAD OF MALES WHO WERE SOCIALIZED LIKE THE BOYS ABOVE AND USES THIS TO HARM THEM. PLEASE DO NOT DELVE FURTHER AT THE MOMENT INTO HER SITE AND RETURN TO KEEP READING HERE. A SUFFICIENT EXCERPT IS LISTED BELOW. You will see that as she is a trained psychologist as well she understand the effect of male socialization in our society. You will see how this socialization indeed leads males with trauma from this wide spread socialization to gravitate to this type of life style and abuse from females. This socialization is wide spread and affects men and boys in our society well beyond the extreme ends. Can you see how the psychoanalysis below corresponds with the male socialization of sole mother authority, sole female authority, feminist indoctrination or "relational-ization" and shaming tactics that takes place in our schools and absence of a father in a young boys life to form his masculine identity?

3. What kind of relationship did you have with your Mother when you were a child?
(Stroke his face and hair)
3a)-Was she the one who would discipline you when you misbehaved?
3b)-Can you recall any intense experiences that you had with her when she was disciplining you? Like was she ever extra forceful or physical with you?
3c)-How is your relationship with your Mother today?
3d)-How do you feel about your Mother?
4.-Do you have an older sister (or older sisters)?
(Continue with face and hair stroking)
4a)-What kind of a relationship did you have with her (or with them) when you were growing up?
4b)-Can you recall any experiences with her (them) that you would classify as female domination?
5.-Can you recall having submissive feelings toward any other women when you were growing up?
5a)-Grandmother?
5b)-Aunt?
5c)-Teacher?
5d)-Babysitter?
5e)-Other female authority figures?
http://elisesutton.homestead.com/Main.html
http://www.femalesuperiority.com/

We've trusted our women in these female dominated spheres of society to understand boys and cultivate their masculinity in a positive way. THESE WOMEN AND INDEED MEN LIKE THE ONE ABOVE HAVE BEEN SHUFFLED THROUGH SOCIALIZATION AND FEMINIST WOMEN'S STUDIES BOOT CAMPS LIKE THE ONE I ATTENDED IN COLLEGE. IT IS TIME TO INTERJECT AND DEMAND CHANGE NOW!! THIS IS HAPPENING IN THE UNITED STATES AS I HAVE BEEN A VICTIM OF THIS VILIFICATION OF MALES FIRST HAND IN MY COLLEGE AS WELL! THESE WOMEN HAVE MORE INFLUENCE IN OUR SOCIETY AND IN FEMALE DOMINATED SPHERES OF SOCIALIZATION THAN YOU WOULD EVER LIKE TO BELIEVE! THEY ARE ORGANIZED,WELL FUNDED AND HIGHLY MOTIVATED.



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>The elements of modern male socialization are very real. Though the author of the above site is a radical gender feminist her tenacious radical views have led her to say more than most feminists would want you to know. I would ordinarily declare her insane and a nut case but what she has divulged completed a picture for me that I have been struggling to put together. From experience both personal and researched I have put the picture together. She as well as many feminists in the inner ranks believe that men and male biological purpose to the pair bond is increasingly becoming unnecessary. At this point it has been made possible that men are to be kept either as an accessory within a marriage or disposed of in divorce while bound to the subservient obligation to provide her alimony as well as child support while completely being ostracized and isolated from the family unit and denied the right to be a father. In terms of resource provision there is no difference in or out of a marriage. They dynamic and battle plan is two fold and begins with the elimination of the father. This is seen as instrumental to the feminist movement. It is imperative during the transition to female supremacy that male resource provision continue to be transfered to the female while the male remains in isolation from the children, especially boys.

Contemporary feminist thought mildly advocates the necessity of a "positive male role model" but clearly states that a father is unnecessary to the raising of healthy children. In fact she states that the lack of a father or males in a boys life is instrumental in instilling in boys respect for sole mother authority and indeed is further reinforced by the exposure of the male to predominantly female teachers, authority figures and feminist socialization curriculum. Once this is accomplished The plan is then followed up with continued tactics within schools to shame and humiliate and socialize boys into subservient positions. This occurs from end to end through our educational system and into the college level curriculum (Please see video above). The author and many feminists believe that once male biological purpose to a pair bond is nullified in actuality or systemically, as women are completely independent for reliance on a male to the pair bond the gates will then be open for full and complete male submission for female choice in any way deemed useful. Since male resource provision is not needed and with the continued goal of out performing males in the economic realm males will then clamor for acceptance of female choice by any means deemed useful to females up to and including complete and utter domination of every aspect of his life.


Indeed it is speculated that boys have slipped to 42% of college admissions because of a natural process or shift toward female self sufficiency and early socialization of boys for failure which is performed by the isolation of a young male from contact with other males. As such the author states that there are no factors in play that are lowering boys performance but this is a natural shift toward women's preference which is also advocated and socialized to women in Women's Studies classes of leaving and isolating males from other males and their father thus serving to influence as the sole authorities in a young males life leading to scholastic decline. IT IS TAUGHT THAT MARRIAGE IS A PRISON. In my Women's Studies class we were told that women exhibit POW syndrome within marriage and it is explicitly denounced. Marriage is a something men have done to oppress women. (Place Fatherless family boys performance stat here)

She speculated that as males are taught sole female authority and begin to feel more useless as resource provision from the male is increasingly nullified and unnecessary to the female the transition to female supremacy will continute.

The incentive for ostrization of the male father from the pair bond in marriage is synthetic and systemic and women's option to leave the bond of marriage is subsidized by society, governmental husbandry and isolation of the the resource producing father. It is infact now the norm. It is further supported by synthetic organizations of government husbandry such as WIC Women Infants Children and organizations of the like.

Feminism in Schools-
(FATHERS PLEASE BE AWARE OF WHAT IS BEING TAUGHT TO OUR BOYS. I HAVE TAKEN A WOMEN'S STUDIES COARSE AND KNOW FULL WELL WHAT HAPPENS IN OUR COLLEGES. I HAVE BEEN SHOWN VIDEOS OF MEN LOOKING AT WOMEN AND THEIR BODIES WHILE IT IS EXCLAIMED THAT THIS IS SEXIST AND SOMEHOW WRONG. I KNOW THAT THESE COURSE CURICULUMS ARE NOT PEER REVIEWED BY RESPONSIBLE FELLOWSHIP OF ACADEMICS. I KNOW THAT IF THEY ARE THAT THEY ARE DONE SO WITHIN THE HEGEMONY OF PEOPLE WHO ASCRIBE TO THE FEMINIST DOCTRINE. INDOCTRINATION STARTS YOUNG. SINGLE MOTHERS DO NOT CARE, IT IS UP TO YOU TO SAVE OUR BOYS)

Please leave a comment to let me know what you think. To let me know in some way I am making a difference!

4 comments:

Novaseeker said...

I wouldn't pay elise sutton much attention. She's a female supremacist, but largely because she lives her life in the femdom fetish subculture. She then extrapolates grandiose ideas based on the submissive men she has met in that subculture. What she spouts is obviously offensive, but it doesn't represent feminism very well because as much as I dislike feminism, I also know that most feminist women are not femdom dominatrix fetishists -- so sutton doesn't really speak for them.

Anonymous said...

In the immortal words of many fiction characters, "What are you trying to say?"

You address the issue in such a roundabout way that, to be perfectly honest, I am having serious trouble decyphering exactly what you're claiming that women and trying to do and how they're trying to go about it...

The best I can gather is that you are saying that feminism is basically trying to turn society into an Amazon Warrior-type scenario where women are women and men are slaves (kind of the opposite of how many ancient societies were, effectively) and that feminism is going about this by way of teaching that males are generally bad and need to be complete pussies, entirely subserviant to women...

That WOULD be my best guess as to what you're claiming... However, that is so... well... crazy... that I am having trouble taking it seriously and a large part of me figures I must have misinterpreted what you're trying to say...

So I ask... Could you tell me, in brief if you would, exactly what it is you are trying to say? What's the bottom line here? What's the moral of the story?

-A confused male

Anonymous said...

What makes you think that this is something new or that women are behind it? A docile submissive male population is less prone to uprisings against the occupying force. Rulers have always utilized the female population in order to subjugate the male population. The Chinese are doing the same thing in Tibet. The Catholic Church did the same thing throughout Europe during the middle ages. Those boys who were too smart to want to be cannon fodder were steered into the clergy. Or even outright castrated in order to sing in the choir more sweetly.

Anonymous said...

Elise Sutton is a businesswoman. In business the objective is always to buy low and to sell high. For the highest price the market will bear.