Monday, June 29, 2009

The Mancession: Women (Women's Party) Divert Stimulus Package To Themselves

In either case I really don't care what they do to avert another great depression by spending 10 Trillion. I think we are delaying the inevitable and the end of America as we know it. We are flat broke but I don't really give a shit anymore.

Women have diverted the Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 09 funds to women and the health and education fields for some reason all though these sectors have been growing and added 588,000 jobs, something about making sure the money didn't go to "burly men" as women's groups put it and "white male construction workers" as Robert Reich put it. Our leaders are sexist bitch boys with no back bone. The idea was to create what Obama called "shovel ready" projects to stave off the "mancession" as economist have been calling it as 80% of job losses have been to men.

"Women's groups were appalled. Grids? Dams? Energy Projects? Construction? Manufacturing?!!!!!!!! Opinion pieces immediately appeared in major newspapers with titles like "Where are the New Jobs for Women?" and "The Macho Stimulus Plan." A group of "notable feminist economists" circulated a petition that quickly garnered more than 600 signatures, calling on the president-elect to add projects in health, child care, education, and social services and to "institute apprenticeships" to train women for "at least one third" of the infrastructure jobs. (Though we have trained men ready to build) At the same time, more than 1,000 feminist historians signed an open letter urging Obama not to favor a "heavily male-dominated field" like construction: "We need to rebuild not only concrete and steel bridges but also human bridges." As soon as these groups became aware of each other, they formed an anti-stimulus plan action group called WEAVE-- Women's Equality Adds Value to the Economy." >

Upon bearing the brunt of the chorus of feminist opposition, President Obama backed down and changed his plan to cover non affected and growing industries where women predominate. Indeed we are a country fractured by race and gender. What is good for men is not good for women and so we go our separate ways as feminsts desire.

Knowing women hold the vote he placated to gender feminists. After rewritting the plan he then tasked Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, Joseph Biden's chief economist, with preparing an extraordinary report that calculated not only the number of jobs the plan would likely create, but the gender composition of the various employment sectors and the division of largess between women and men. Romer and Bernstein delivered "The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" on January 10.

The result: Although 80% of job loss occured in manufacturing and construction and 5 million men are out of work the report concluded "the stimulus package now "skews job creation somewhat towards women"

The feminist's who unfortunatly represent all women have won, the feminists who run our country delighted. When told women are not being protected and provided for government and men respond, diverting the stimulus bill strategy toward women and growth industries.

The provision and protection of women has become the priority to the detriment of our nation. Such it is that men have always felt inclined to provide and protect women and children and now it will destroy us, our muscles bleed dry, our weary unemployed men will soon be wandering aimlessly in the streets with the rest of the 85% of the homeless that are men.

Women that are stay at home mothers and children are entitled to the labors of men but when women are given direct access to the coffers of government it is women's inate sense of entitlement that will destroy our nation. Or men, our leaders, are spineless bitch boys. Our president a momma's boy with no father raised with sole female authority surrounded by his new "Council on Women and Girls" and placating balllessly to radical gender feminists from the 60's and 70's now in power.

In the words of Dr. Martin Luther King It is my hope that males will "one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Not by their gender but by their potential for contribution to family, our people and our nation.

What a joke...What a matrilinial, matriarchial gynocracy we live in today where dire economic decissions are made on what will benefit women as a separate class away from men and families. The restructuring of our economic stimulus investment based on gender and not economics. What will benefit women in the short term but cause the very downfall of a once great and mighty empire...A land rife with class conflict, division and dominated by gender secular ideology, a people no longer united but divided.

God save my country....god save my country...Prepare me to fight for myself, my future and my people. Give me safe bastion to rely on and survive by myself and myself alone, my nation has forsaken us all. Give me the strength to survive by the bounty you have given us, the bounty we ignore as my people have lost sight of what we could have been, what we can become when we see things as indivisible, under one nation, one people.....

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Early Feminist Rally Photos and Buttons

Since it's beginnings the Feminist's have polished their image and public perception of their agenda. Throughout my blog I will illustrate how indeed feminism has destroyed marriage and it's relation to socialist and communist theory; how the laws they have successfully lobbied to create have been instituted as law.

As I've experienced in my Women's Studies class ("The Psychology of Women") in college in 2002, the feminists have not gone away but are stronger and more influential and relevant than ever. The "battle of the sexes", the war between men and women is not over. More and more it has been a clean sweeping victory for feminists and the women who benefit from such entitlements.

As a young man in my culture I have taken a stand among the growing ranks of men who identify as MRA's or Men's Rights Activists. I know that someday men will be treated as equals and have the same rights as women. I hope that someday we can end this war. I hope to have a wife someday, I hope to have a baby child. I am afraid of marriage as I know I stand to loose my children, my home, my property and will be forced to support my ex wife through alimony and child support. I have seen what has happened to my brother, my father, my friends and other men.

This new phenomenon of explaining away the problem with pop cultural propaganda against men will not help. The precipitous decline in marriage is explained as "Men are afraid of commitment". I will tell the world one thing about men and what I know about myself as a man, the one thing the human male is not lacking in is his ability, strength, mental resilience and fortitude to commit to something he desires or believes in.

The endless movies (Failure to Launch, 40 year old virgin, Old School, Knocked Up, etc) portraying men as grown up children unwilling or
incapable of taking on the responsibilities of husband, father and family will not help mend men, women and the family back together.

"Don't Cook Dinner, Starve a Rat Today!"
"End Human Sacrifice, Don't Get Married"

"Vote Socialist Workers in '70". Recognize the symbol on the button? This was the beginning of the Feminist Majority an extremely powerful feminist organization in the United States at the moment and one of the primary opponents to the shared parenting bill that allows men to be fathers. They are also the creators of the "This is what a feminist looks like" campaign.

Initially, many feminist leaders spoke openly about their Marxist Communist and Socialist intentions. Though it became recognized that as classical, open advocation of Marxism could not be implemented in American culture a focus on introducing Cultural Marxism and subversion of the culture to Marxist ideas became the focus. Indeed this is still the focus of the Feminist Majority and feminism today.

Perhaps I should post the divorce rate graph here again but as you can see from the graph I've posted on my other articles, it all began here, with the above. It began with second wave feminism and change of divorce law that took away all of men's rights to their children, their property, their home and rights to his own working labor by forced alimony and child support. Why women were able to do this without a fight is astonishing to me. I think when women scream they are not provided or protected for enough men and government respond to help. Perhaps chivalry is a factor here, male instinct perhaps was used against men. They say chivalry is dead now. I think it is alive and well in the political and judicial sphere but mainly dead from what sociologists are calling our "hook up" culture. Commitment to women, marriage and family is dying in the hearts of men.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Girl Power, Princesses and Female Socialization

What do the below photo's tell you of female socialization in our culture?

While walking through a parking lot the other day I noticed a boy laying back in this car with the drivers seat reclined. I gave the car a long look and unabashedly walked my way around it observing the writings some girls had written on his car. I found so much significance in them that after returning to my car and the boy got out and left inside the store, I returned to take these photos. On each side of the car is written a different boy that the girl or girls love. What does this tell us in the way these girls view themselves? What connection do they seem to illustrate between power and love? What sense of entitlement and power is embodied in the word "princess". I have often seen "princess" displayed autonomously and independently of an individual girls relationship with males as has been displayed on bumper stickers, shirts etc that girls in our culture present. How do they see themselves and define their relationships with males? Is a princess someone who gives to or receives things from others?

What are girls taught about themselves and are these things true?

Would a boy displaying or writting "prince" or "king" and inscribing "male power" on a car have the same meaning? Is the message of female underprivlege used to give girls and women more rights, choices, protections and benefits in society than men? Is it used to give them less responsibility and obligations?




Saturday, June 20, 2009

Obama's View of Fathers

Obama's View of Fathers:

Father's Day 2007: "Let's admit to ourselves that there are a lot of men out there that need to stop acting like boys; who need to realize that responsibility does not end at conception; who need to know that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child but the courage to raise a child."


Let's admit to ourselves that there are a lot of women out there than need to stop acting like girls; who need to realize that responsibility does not end at conception; who need to know that what makes you a woman is not the ability to have a child but the courage to raise a child.

First of all Mr. President it is only women who have the right of abortion of responsibility after conception. Men have no rights in this manner only women. Second if the president does not know that men are shut out of fatherhood by law through divorce and left childless, homeless and broke I don't know what to say. If the president does not know we have a 40% single woman birth rate, I don't know what to say. If he does not know that 70% of divorces are initiated by women I don't know what to say other than who is abandoning who. Who is it really who is abandoning their families???