Monday, January 31, 2011
Barbara Kay On Institutional Feminism and Misandry
Barbara Kay On Institutional Feminism and Misandry
The quiet feminist takeover of society... the pernicious misandry... the militant and divisive zero-sum, win-lose assumptions of the ruling feminist movement... Unfair treatment of males as disposable. The apparently shocking notion that women are capable of violence.
"I consider feminism a very pernicious ideology. I think it is the ruling ideology of our time" -Barbara Kay
"President Obama spoke about creating jobs through building our country's physical infrastructure, investing in research and development, and reinventing our energy industry. Worthy objectives -- but currently these fields are dominated by men." -President of The National Organization for Women Terry O,Neil
The quiet feminist takeover of society... the pernicious misandry... the militant and divisive zero-sum, win-lose assumptions of the ruling feminist movement... Unfair treatment of males as disposable. The apparently shocking notion that women are capable of violence.
"I consider feminism a very pernicious ideology. I think it is the ruling ideology of our time" -Barbara Kay
"President Obama spoke about creating jobs through building our country's physical infrastructure, investing in research and development, and reinventing our energy industry. Worthy objectives -- but currently these fields are dominated by men." -President of The National Organization for Women Terry O,Neil
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Dr Tara J. Palmatier, PsyD on Men's Rights and Interview with MRA luminary Mr. Paul Elam.
She makes some very good points:
--"The post-feminist pendulum has swung too far to the other extreme. How is it just that a man can be forcibly removed from a home he paid for based on nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim of abuse? (Just do a search for ‘how do I get my husband out of the house.’) How is it just that one adult, by virtue of his sex, is financially responsible for another able-bodied adult just by virtue of her sex after the relationship ends and often for the rest of his lifetime? Even child support ends when a child becomes an adult. Why isn’t custody automatically presumed 50/50 in every state? Why aren’t women required to pay support for the 50% of the time the children are with their fathers (if the father is lucky enough to get 50/50 custody)? Why aren’t women prosecuted for making false abuse claims and violating court orders?"--
Somehow we must figure out a way to get women to support shared financial responsibility and shared parental responsibility. We must put our foot down and get women to take on adult responsibilities, obligations and liabilities. We have to make this law so that men can be treated as human beings and obtain rights over our bodies and the God given right to fatherhood as well. Women have no right to do what they have done and I expect them to take responsibility in changing it.
Full Article:
http://shrink4men.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/introduction-to-the-mens-movement-interview-with-paul-elam-of-a-voice-for-men/
--"The post-feminist pendulum has swung too far to the other extreme. How is it just that a man can be forcibly removed from a home he paid for based on nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim of abuse? (Just do a search for ‘how do I get my husband out of the house.’) How is it just that one adult, by virtue of his sex, is financially responsible for another able-bodied adult just by virtue of her sex after the relationship ends and often for the rest of his lifetime? Even child support ends when a child becomes an adult. Why isn’t custody automatically presumed 50/50 in every state? Why aren’t women required to pay support for the 50% of the time the children are with their fathers (if the father is lucky enough to get 50/50 custody)? Why aren’t women prosecuted for making false abuse claims and violating court orders?"--
Somehow we must figure out a way to get women to support shared financial responsibility and shared parental responsibility. We must put our foot down and get women to take on adult responsibilities, obligations and liabilities. We have to make this law so that men can be treated as human beings and obtain rights over our bodies and the God given right to fatherhood as well. Women have no right to do what they have done and I expect them to take responsibility in changing it.
Full Article:
http://shrink4men.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/introduction-to-the-mens-movement-interview-with-paul-elam-of-a-voice-for-men/
Friday, January 7, 2011
More On Female Supremacy and Matriarchy
“Poison in, poison out” -Fidelbogen
There is someone over on the Reddit forum thread who thinks there is no connection between feminism and the fact that these sort of women support it and actively fund it (See: Next article below this blog post.) I highly doubt this guy has put the pieces together. Watch Hanna Rosin's Video at the TED Women’s Conference, go to the archive that I've provided and make the connection yourself. He clearly has outlined the connection that Femdom radicals have to the Feminist Establishment.
Femdom Radicals are the Feminist Establishment’s most ardent supporters. There is a reason they see those documents in the feminist archive as supremacist and leading to the subjugation of men…..it is because it does lead to it. The goal of Feminists and their associated cadre in Femdom is to CONTROL THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION. This, as any social justice person such as Karl Marx would tell you IS THE KEY TO CLASS EQUALITY (COMMUNISM) BUT ALSO CLASS OPPRESSION.
In Marxist terms, the bourgeois plans of feminists are crystal clear i.e. control the means of human production i.e. sex which is their biological mandate already but ALSO to control access to resources by owning the means of production of resources through totalitarian feminist law over male production and the transference of resources to females by way of men, directly in their personal lives and directly from the public treasury. Feminists also plan to usurp male production capacity all together. In fact, the economy has been homogenized toward the service sector and female dominated industry. Women now control 60% of the nations wealth and outearn men in all major metropolitan cities.
When females are the primary means of resource production themselves, when they own the means to male production (and thus transference of male resources without a fair social contract between men and women in marriage and thus divorce) plus own the means of human production i.e. total control over reproduction and conception the Matriarchy and dream of female supremacy will be complete.
WOMEN ARE LARGELY THERE NOW AND THEY WILL NOT STOP WITH THIS AGENDA. We as men can find solace in the fact that the system will end up consuming itself of its own means of production. Female supremacy and matriarchy is unsustainable.
I have no doubt that there is something in female nature that is all consumptious all consummate. If males served no other purpose than as food after mating she would surely consume us. It is this aspect of female nature which has been obscured as of late but men have known it since the beginning of time. If we continue on course with the dominate social, political and economic agency and agenda of women, the worst is yet to come before the system collapses or is conquered by a balanced culture with highly enfranchised, highly motivated males with families.
We all know the definition of Matriarchy: Men are not members of the family or the lives of our children.
China's Mosuo Tribe: The World's Last Matriarchy? Women from the Mosuo tribe do not marry, take as many lovers as they wish and have no word for "father" or "husband."
More on the matriarchal social construct Here
See: Father's Day....No fathers
There is someone over on the Reddit forum thread who thinks there is no connection between feminism and the fact that these sort of women support it and actively fund it (See: Next article below this blog post.) I highly doubt this guy has put the pieces together. Watch Hanna Rosin's Video at the TED Women’s Conference, go to the archive that I've provided and make the connection yourself. He clearly has outlined the connection that Femdom radicals have to the Feminist Establishment.
Femdom Radicals are the Feminist Establishment’s most ardent supporters. There is a reason they see those documents in the feminist archive as supremacist and leading to the subjugation of men…..it is because it does lead to it. The goal of Feminists and their associated cadre in Femdom is to CONTROL THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION. This, as any social justice person such as Karl Marx would tell you IS THE KEY TO CLASS EQUALITY (COMMUNISM) BUT ALSO CLASS OPPRESSION.
In Marxist terms, the bourgeois plans of feminists are crystal clear i.e. control the means of human production i.e. sex which is their biological mandate already but ALSO to control access to resources by owning the means of production of resources through totalitarian feminist law over male production and the transference of resources to females by way of men, directly in their personal lives and directly from the public treasury. Feminists also plan to usurp male production capacity all together. In fact, the economy has been homogenized toward the service sector and female dominated industry. Women now control 60% of the nations wealth and outearn men in all major metropolitan cities.
When females are the primary means of resource production themselves, when they own the means to male production (and thus transference of male resources without a fair social contract between men and women in marriage and thus divorce) plus own the means of human production i.e. total control over reproduction and conception the Matriarchy and dream of female supremacy will be complete.
WOMEN ARE LARGELY THERE NOW AND THEY WILL NOT STOP WITH THIS AGENDA. We as men can find solace in the fact that the system will end up consuming itself of its own means of production. Female supremacy and matriarchy is unsustainable.
I have no doubt that there is something in female nature that is all consumptious all consummate. If males served no other purpose than as food after mating she would surely consume us. It is this aspect of female nature which has been obscured as of late but men have known it since the beginning of time. If we continue on course with the dominate social, political and economic agency and agenda of women, the worst is yet to come before the system collapses or is conquered by a balanced culture with highly enfranchised, highly motivated males with families.
We all know the definition of Matriarchy: Men are not members of the family or the lives of our children.
China's Mosuo Tribe: The World's Last Matriarchy? Women from the Mosuo tribe do not marry, take as many lovers as they wish and have no word for "father" or "husband."
More on the matriarchal social construct Here
See: Father's Day....No fathers
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Female Supremacist Organizations & Feminist Front Groups
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Monday, January 3, 2011
NAWALT: NOT ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT
I found this guy on YouTube: Interesting stuff. I'm glad that men are increasingly speaking out about the injustices we face and how complicit women have been in implementing them against us. I started this blog on my own and it was months later that I started to realize that this was a growing movement and that there were so many others out there. This video reflects my sentiments in regard to something women should have more of, HONOR AND ACCOUNTABILITY.
HONOR AND ACCOUNTABILITY are masculine values I know but I'm hoping women can earn respect. I'm hoping women will take action and see themselves as more than passive beneficiaries to the feminist onslaught. Women and society are beginning to bear the consequences of feminism. Women deserve the men they are creating. Continued Complicit inaction will reveal the true intentions and character of women.
Channel Link:
http://www.youtube.com/user/barbarossaaaa#p/a
Saturday, January 1, 2011
No Maternal Instincts
She said she works in the "infant room" at her school...interesting. What has happened to our women and the family is quite interesting. I often spend a lot of time socializing, especially with women. So many women have told me that they don't want children. They tell me that children are a burden to women. I finally decided to video tape this phenomenon. I think it must have much to do with the fact that our birthrate and marriage rates are at historical lows and falling. Our birth rate, in fact, is below replacement levels This is a demographic nightmare which has deleterious and dire social, economic and political ramifications. I believe Western culture and civilization, particularly America, is in a state of precipitous decline.
I particularly liked the part where the young man says "That's good actually". I understand his motive but do not respect men for this. The socio-sexual dichotomy plays out into the larger cultural context and is an element of what MRAs describe as a Mangina.
Anyway, It's interesting how far along we have come toward implementing the ideals propagated by the American Cultural Revolution, The Sexual Revolution and Marxist Gender Feminism i.e. Marxist class "equality". The results are increasingly making themselves apparent and have not resulted in the utopian society women sought to create.
Hmmm "infant room"......
"The state is responsible for the upbringing of children" "The woman who takes up the struggle for the liberation of the working class must learn to understand that there is no more room for the old proprietary attitude which says: “These are my children, I owe them all my maternal solicitude and affection; those are your children, they are no concern of mine and I don’t care if they go hungry and cold – I have no time for other children.” The worker-mother must learn not to differentiate between yours and mine; she must remember that there are only our children, the children of Russia’s communist workers."
-Alexandra Kollontai -Komunistka, No. 2, 1920, and in English in The Worker, 1920
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)