Thursday, July 30, 2009

Sperm Banks Men for Sale


Just have your doctor sign the quick and easy A1 form and our exclusive collection of males await your choice! Why waste your time with no-fault divorce, alimony woman support and child support! Yes women get custody of children by default, yes the man is forced to support you outside of marriage but we cut to the chase. With all the government benefits to single mothers and the rise of the independent woman, you to can have the male genes of your dreams without the hassle! Act now!

oooooooh! how much is male number 03409? I can't wait to come in and see his mug shot in the male albums they set at the coffee table. Let's see 03409....ohhhh wow he's a looker! Your one stop source for the best male genes! Order yours today, no man necessary, no father needed! Act now, opening an account with us is easy!

Once registered we will ship your male genes next day air! It's that easy!
You can even select your male genes by what Hollywood celebrity the male looks like.
Single motherhood and the best gene quality has never been easier!

"I think that women who want to get married and have children, may have to compromise on the GENE QUALITY of the man for his ability to financially support the child.
however women who have stable careers and think they can support the child alone, are in a unique position to get the BEST GENES for their children if they are willing to be single mothers. Single motherhood is increasingly becoming an option for women."

"Most women may not be able to marry the tall, attractive, guy with good proportions and health and have his kids, but having such a guy to donate his sperm may be easier. for this reason, young Nordic and Mediterranean men are in great demand"

(and their sperm goes for a decent price -added exemplification).

"The point is that if you have decided to raise the child alone and dont bother that the biological father is legally absolved of the responsiblity then why not choose the genes of best quality for your child?"

"Just imagine how good it will be for women if we had more state benefits for child support, if only we had a system where the state was responsible for bringing up the kids and women would not have to chase after men to marry them and share the burden of supporting and in the process compromising on genetic quality, choosing ugly, fat, bald, short unattractive men only because they were willing to be good supporters.
this is not FREEDOM of choice for women. women are forced to choose these men."

(The law says that men have to support us but they don't always send us all the money they are supposed to even when they are sent to jail or pay interest payments to us for punishment. The problem is that we only get more money from men the more they feel involved in their child's life. -added exemplification)

The stats:
90.2% of fathers with joint custody pay the support due.
79.1% of fathers with visitation privileges pay the support due.
44.5% of fathers with no visitation pay the support due.

(The fact is that women now have complete control over conception and all the reproductive rights. Men don't even have paternity fraud laws to protect them much less abortion or even the right to custody of their own children. Men are to be taken or left out and we still get supported by them. -exemplification)

"In the ideal society i talk about where there is 100% state child support, women would be free to choose the men they really want to conceive from and the genes they really think would create the healthy, beautiful babies they want."

(Single motherhood is your choice and every independent woman's choice, this is the reason we fought for equality, so that we won't need men or to keep or commit to men anymore as husbands or fathers. Men don't really have any vital importance anymore nor are they necessary to be happy. That's what equality is all about to give us choices and freedoms -added exemplification).

"Meanwhile, more single women--especially those watching their biological clocks run down--are resorting to solo pregnancies, sperm donors or adoption agencies. While the birthrate has fallen among teenagers, it has climbed 15% among UNmarried thirtysomethings since 1990. In the TIME/CNN poll, fully 61% of single women ages 18 to 49 answered yes when asked whether they would consider rearing a child on their own." (The single woman birth rate is at an all time high of 40% of all births)

"The four lead characters on TV's Sex and the City, single women who live the supafly life and discard men quicker than last season's bag and shoes--and look damn good doing it. All of them, nevertheless, are part of a major societal shift: single women, once treated as virtual outcasts, have moved to the center of our social and cultural life. Unattached females--wisecracking, gutsy gals, not pathetic saps--are the heroine du jour in fiction, from Melissa Bank's collection of stories, The Girls' Guide to Hunting and Fishing, to Helen Fielding's Bridget Jones's Diary, the publishing juggernaut that has spawned one sequel and will soon be a movie. The single woman is TV's It Girl as well, not just on Sex and the City, the smash HBO series in the midst of its third buzz-producing season, but also on a growing number of network shows focused on strong, career-minded single women, such as Judging Amy and Providence."


(We don't really need men for anything. I'm looking for a soul mate, a man that can make me happy. I've worked to hard to have this type of freedom and am not going to compromise that. I've worked to hard to get to where I am, to be independent. Women today can have a man in or out of marriage and it's not a big deal, he still has to send us alimony and child support. With the rise of affordable, quality child care and even the prospect of paid maternity leave I'm able to pursue true individual freedom. Being a single women or a single mother is a choice and it's empowering to women, it's men's job to help us do it, not that we need their money anyway, but it's nice to have the extra income.

Men must know that we don't need them and that they must compete amongst each other for something else now, namely how they can please us and make us happy. Women can have offspring and reproduce anytime we want and in many different ways, with men or without them. It's men who have to have something to offer us, now a days this can be anything we want. Men are intimidated by successful women for a reason, we are competing for and taking away the things we demand they offer us. I'm sure it's humiliating but I require that they still pay for my food and drinks and other entertainment on dates. If I feel like it I'll throw in a token offer to pay something but they always know the safer bet is to pay up and they always do...LOL.

If I wanted to be married and let a man commit and propose to me I would. I've actually turned down several men. Today, men are panderers and useless as husbands or fathers. Don't you see, the whole point of "independence" is to not need a man and the whole point of not needing a man is to make them want and need us more than we need them.

If I do have kids it will be later on. I'm not going to get off this ride for a while. Besides I am never short of a date and men "know how to treat a woman" when their courting us to be a good suitor. My advise is to wait until about 30 years old. Men are so marginalized they go for older women now. I think the best insurance for a woman when she decides to do so is to get married, divorce, find another guy but stay single. That way I can enjoy the benefits of my new man while still receiving alimony from the old one.


"Vickie of Orlando e-mailed, "I receive a nice alimony check each month, eventually 50 percent of his Social Security, and upon his death, hundreds of thousands in life insurance. So why would I even think of getting married again?"

Women today have all the choices and this is what equality for women is all about. We don't need men and are independent but they still have to support us and even pay for us on dates, in marriage and most importantly after we leave them in no-fault divorce. Men are always there for us to lean on, lol. Feminist divorce laws implemented in the 70's or what these Men's Rights MRA freaks call "MARRIAGE 2.0" has done wonders for women's equality. Women initiate 70+% of all divorce for a reason and this does not include the growing number of women who decide to leave the increasing amount of cohabitant relationships. If a man does not make me happy I take the home, his money and his children and force him to support me. It's really that simple and yes it's really that empowering.

Think about it, Marsha, we earn 60% of ALL college degrees, and still have Affirmative Action, Title IX, women only loans, women only full scholarships etc. Competitive learning has been banned from our schools in favor of cooperative learning. Just put the boys on drugs like Ritalin and give it some name like Attention Deficit HyperActivity Disorder or ADHD. Boys aren't even allowed to play dodge ball anymore. Teach them that they have a disease where they can't pay attention and are hyperactive and make everyone think boys just have this disease. Just tell them to shut up or go to detention.

Women have been earning more bachelor’s degrees than men since 1982, and more master’s degrees than men since 1981. In 2006, women earned 57% of all bachelor’s degrees, 58% of all master’s, and 47% of all doctorates and first professional degrees. But guess what women are projected to EXCEED 50% of enrollment for doctorates and first professional degrees for the first time in 2006. Who will these women marry, I don't really care but I can tell you one thing, not a man less successful and educated than I am, but I'm sure we will find a use for them, they won't like it but they really will have no other choice ; )

By 2016 women are projected to receive over 60% of bachelor degrees, 61% of master’s degrees and over 53% of all doctorate and first professional degrees We live 7 years longer AND have 7 federal offices for women's health, men have not 1 though they suffer from all health aliments more than we do, are 80% of all suicides and 85% of the homeless, 96% of workplace deaths and combat deaths. All this and the president just opened up The Council on Women and Girls to help us even more. Men just won't stop being chivalrous, protecting and providing for us, what pansies they are.

Listen, women make 80% of all consumer purchases in this country and by 2010 will have 60% of the nations wealth. Think about it, women don't get paid less for the same job, we get paid less as a whole of the population because we don't have the same obligations men do and make different choices, we are not forced by law to support them. The wage gap of 22 cents (78 cents to the dollar) is the Raw Wage Gap or adding up how much men and women make in the entire work force. Besides where do you think government money and men's money goes guessed it, right into our pocket in government entitlements and forced male labor to support us which more than makes up for those 22 cents.

We don't have to defend the country, can have a man removed from the home or his child and thrown in jail by word alone and best of all men don't have any rights in divorce. I remember a time when I got pissed at my boyfriend, threw plates at him, broke glasses, slapped and hit him and then called the police to take him to jail, lol. All I have to do is call the big strong police men to help protect are so stupid. That's why we have the Violence Against Women Act : ) Do you think we will ever replace "women's shelters" with counseling centers for families? Men don't even have assault laws to protect them nor domestic violence services, heck boys of 12 years of age or older can't even enter a shelter. That's why we put these ads up in order to show little boys as criminals and little girls as victims. It's our way of saying that family violence is always the fault of men and is always perpetrated by men and we like it that way.

We are able to cast men out of the home and family and there is nothing he can do about it. That's the big trick, even though women hold 54% percent of the vote, if you look at the voting numbers at all levels of government we still vote for men, why, because men will provide, protect and die for us into their own oblivion, they always have, it's their instinct.

They won't put up a fight, male suicide has tripled since 1970 so they will just kill themselves off. We've got them between a rock and a hard place and there is nothing they will do about it! In 1964, 72 percent of men voted for president, while that number today has dropped to 53 percent today. Add men's retreat from the public sphere and our 54% voting majority and there you have it, a country run by women and our needs and the men who serve them! Do you think were going to open up an office on men's health or give them anything like shared custody of our children, hell no, we still have a long way to go and are still oppressed by men who insist on providing for us and protecting us even though we are independent. We've fought long and hard to be independent and not need men for anything and we are not about to give that up. We can have our cake and eat it to! ; ) Men are simply being shut out and dropping out of society. Look at their labor force participation not to mention their only 40% of earned college degrees and falling.

They won't save themselves from this and women of course will not save them either, the end game has been played and of course as always, men provided and protected us without a fight. I don't feel a bit of pity for them, that's what men are for, to provide and protect us while being expendable and disposable and they know their place in society and what happens in marriage if the do not please me....bye bye provider man, provide from an empty apartment for now on, oh and I hope you miss your children.... LOL ; ). We as women have managed to create so many law, rights and privileges for ourselves we are now a separate class away from men and family. Class warfare with men is evident. Men know they have a lot of pleasing to do or else, the stupid dotes don't have any rights, just look at the link below....LOL -exemplification)

------------BELOW:----------A FEMINIST TELLS THE TRUTH-------------------------------
Below: A feminist writes.....

OK. Time to put men out of your misery. Feminism was and is the biggest con in history. We talked endlessly about "equality" yet that was the last thing we wanted. You men have yet to realise that women never say what we mean. It is always shrouded in hyperbole and imagery.

So now, we are so close to having our cake and eating it. Here are just a few examples.

1) We can take you to the cleaners in divorce. No suggestion of equality there. We can have affairs and divorce you and we STILL get the house and maintenance for as long as we need. There is now absolutely no risk in a woman filing for divorce. You men don't even have the right to shag us any more. More and more women are making their husbands live celebate lives in marriage. Once we have that ring on our finger we rule! I am only 27. I have been married three times. Each one I stayed with for three years and then took for every penny I could get. You see, we only have to convince a judge of "irretreivable breakdown" of the relationship. And how is that determined? Easy. When ONE party does not wish the relationship to continue. My current husband needs another year I would say. The business he has built up is not quite where I need it to be yet. When it is, he will go the same way as the others. The house is already mine "for tazx reasons". At least thats what he thinks. I "allowed" my name to be put on the deeds, but he will find come the day that this just means the house is mine already. I tend to go for cash settlements with regard to maintenance which leaves me free to start again. Not that I need to now. By the time I have ditched this poor sap, I will have more than enough to live a very good lifestyle with for the rest of my life. Even if money starts to run short I can always do it again. It's not as if I have to have sex much either. I pick men who are on the way up building their buisnesses. The hours they put in mean they are usually too tired and if they have affairs with their secretaries, well, that just makes it easier for me.

2) We get far less severe prison sentences for the same crimes. We can even murder our new born children and it is written off as Post Natal Depression. Women's groups all over the world are working for the day when no woman will ever be sent to prison for any crime. ANd trust me, that day will come. Take a look..

(British home secretary Baroness Corston has proposed that all women's prisons should be shut down and converted to prisons for men. If adopted by the home secretary, Baroness Corston's approach would see Holloway and about 14 other all-female prisons in England and Wales shut down or converted into jails for men.)

3) In the work place not only do we get paid for taking time off to have children, but now we even get pay rises while we are off, an absolute right in law to return to the job we left and in some cases now, we even get promoted while we are on leave. Employers have to invest in our training, but we are free to screw them over by taking all the training and qualifications we can get of of them and then leaving.

4) We now have senior politicians who advocate "positive descrimination" . In other words, if you are a white male, you are where you belong. At the bottom of the heap. Women are eased into top jobs and ministerial positions in Government. The Sisterhood is alive and well and working beautifully. The Labour Government, always breathtakingly stupid has actually gone as far as prohibiting the selection of male candidates in some wards. Fantastic.

And you poor men. What can one say? All you need is a little show of panty now and then and you are putty in our hands. You and you alone have allowed us to take this supremecy and you have done so without a whimper. When I joined the feminist movement, I didnt really buy into the more vitriolic mantras of "all men are pigs" and "the only good man is a doormat", but now I see you for what you are. A means of providing what I want.

(You are the servant sex, the male-male competition for female sexually selective choice universal to all the animal kingdom, the protectors and providers to your own demise and death, now suffering in health, dying to protect us, competing amongst each other, easily manipulated, you are expendable, disposable, worthless and killing yourself for us, just the way we planned it. Look now, behold all the sniveling dribbling metrosexual feminized men pandering for mating opportunity, desperately trying to find a way now to be of some use to us when we've taken everything you try to provide to us for ourselves. The further we advance the further you will be subjugated to women, the females servant to our own increasingly powerful instituted and ordained entitlements.

We now rule politics, education, healthcare, have all the rights in divorce, conception, reproduction, the justice system you name it. All because you can't help but to provide and protect us to your own demise. The more you resist the more men will restrain other men and create more laws and be rewarded by gaining political power to those that serve females. Yes, that's right we have the voting majority. Men think they are in power when they are simply doing our bidding for us, the work horses for the growing matriarchy. The gates of male subjugation to the female sex are open and not even females ourselves can stop it now! Your plight is hopeless and you don't even know it, victims of your own purpose of utility to the female, your brainless instinct of servitude! Your simply not valued as much and value yourselves less than us. That's why you elect to die to save us and die you will. In our promise of equality to you we have convinced you to eat the apple once again but this time I hope you choke on it. No matter how independent we get, we will always seek out the same things we always have from you and with ever mounting competition with your new and most formidable competitor, not other males but females. We will compete against you for the very things we demand from you until you die.

Look at our big man, our mommas boy, breed with sole female authority. Stand back and watch what happens next.


slwerner said...

"...compromising on genetic quality, choosing ugly, fat, bald, short unattractive men only because they were willing to be good supporters.
this is not FREEDOM of choice for women. women are forced to choose these men."

Seems to me that this dipsh*t misses the obvious corollary question – if women are going to get so “picky” over what male sperm should be allowed to create babies (at taxpayer expense, of course), why the Hell shouldn’t we (men) be just as picky over what female eggs get fertilized?

Maybe those women who may not be able to marry the tall, attractive, guy with good proportions and health, since they obviously lack the genetic traits to do so, ought to have their genes selectively removed from the population as well.

Frankly, we already have a form of this – and it’s not working out so well. In the Ghettos, the Barios, and the trailer parks, (not to pull any punches) UGLY women are constantly getting knocked up by the bad-boy thugs (preferred by these women for their genetic phenotypes), and end up raising the next generation of thugs on the public dole.

And, just for good measure, let’s take a closer look into the “results” of this wrt selecting for the best “male” traits. I think it’s quite obvious that the ugly women end up having some decent looking sons (who look more like their fathers), but few decent looking daughter (most end up looking like the mothers).

So why should we even consider expanding the ability of ugly women to get handsome sperm when all we seem to get out of it is fatherless thugs and more ugly women?

BeltainAmerica said...

She several times mentioned the state paying child support, or something like that.

I think that tells us where these women are actually heading. They wish to marry the state for it to provide the protection etc and then breed with the genes they most want without having to make some man happy.

I guess all us men (and women) on here already knew this but it is amazing how blantantly obvious these women are getting now in admitting it.

slwerner said...

BeltainAmerica - "I think that tells us where these women are actually heading. They wish to marry the state for it to provide the protection etc and then breed with the genes they most want without having to make some man happy."

The unholy convergence of Eugenics, the Welfare State, and (beta-)man-hating feminism.

But, in the eugenic quest for the perfect baby, they leave out one very important and unavoidable piece of reality - it isn't just "ugly, fat, bald, short unattractive men" who contribute "lower quality" genes, because short, fat, ugly, small-breasted women are also putting in the same "bad" stuff in the production of offspring.

If this wymyn such as the author of the piece above are truly bent on pursuing the dreams of Sanger/Hilter, Marx, and Friedan simultaneously, why stop at just selecting for "good" male genes? Why not REQUIRE that every women "9" and below (on the looks scale) who wishes to have a baby MUST be implanted with the egg of a "10" which has been fertilized with the sperm of a tall, handsome, smart, healthy, fit, well-proportioned, and well-endowed alpha-male?

After all, if the genes of "lesser" men are of no value and need to be weeded-out; then so do the genes of "lesser" women.

How would these radical feminists feel if their quest for a perfect baby meant that they would have to bear another women's child?

Well, enough with the snark.

I'm actually kind of wondering where the ideas of this women are coming from.

Is this a preemptive effort to get around the increasing obstacles for women being able to get both their “sexy sons” ( ) and financial support? The proliferation of low-cost DNA paternity tests and allowing men up to two years to figure out that they’ve been cuckolded (and still be free of child alimony) makes the good-old paternity fraud route less tenable. The desirable alphas are getting smarter about carelessly spreading their “seed”. And, fewer “provider” men are getting married than ever.

So, perhaps, to the shallow-mind of a feminist, the ideal approach IS to simply make the government pay for all women’s babies, and let the women pick their desired “designer” sperm.

I guess I won’t be terrible surprised if in the not-to-distant future we start to hear convoluted logical arguments coming from feminists suggesting that if MEN were doing what they are SUPPOSED to do and marrying, divorcing, and quietly handing over child-alimony (for whomever’s children their ex-wives have), more men would be paying for more women’s babies – thus, single men (only) ought to be subject to an extra tax intended to augment child rearing costs for single women.

BeltainAmerica said...

So in essence... a Bachelor tax?

It is amazing how much we seem to be aiming at the Roman fall scenario.

Good points slwerner

slwerner said...

BeltainAmerica - "So in essence... a Bachelor tax?"

Actually, yes.

I hope I don't come across as some nut-case, conspiracy theorist, or what-not; but I was reading the remarks of some avowed MGTOW guy's on the benefits to their own personal lifestyles - not the least of which was their ability to save and invest for the long-term.

Several pointed out their ability to live more frugally, well belows their means. And, they made the point in contrast to the way in which single women tend to live well beyond their means, often going deeply into debt to finance their more ostentatious lifestyles.

Now, my first thought was of how this might end up playing out in light of the debate about health care affordability. The though that crossed my mind was that, at some point, a the money grows tighter, frugal savers will come recast as hoarders - unwilling to share their resources for the common good.

Now, there is some background to my thinking this way. After the failed “Hillary Care” efforts, I started paying closer attention to the way in which those around me made their own health care/medical choices. I personally knew some families that chose to NOT purchase health care insurance – although they were quite able to. Some of them were well off enough to even set up their own “emergency” funding (intended for health care emergencies, but since it was still their money, in their possession, it was not so limited).

Yet others simply chose to spend their available resources on other luxuries rather than insurance. I remember one guy I knew bitching about the hospital bills after one of his sons suffered a broken leg. He griped about the need for nationalized health care (so that others could help pick up the tab for him). But this guy made over six figures, and they lived “large”.

Now, fast-forward a decade or so, and I see similar scenarios playing out in which (now) over-spent singles (primarily women) will seek to attack as “inherently unfair” that they are less able to afford necessities (taking HC insurance to be so) as compared to single men – forgetting to mention the difference in spending choices. My concern is that chivalrous pandering manginas in government might be inclined to try to appease them with such a Bachelor tax – aimed at the savings of those hoarding males.

So, when yet another chick starts in with the “government should pay all women for all babies” crap, I also occurs to me that, given the way logic has come to be twisted, it’s not too big a “leap” to arguing that single mothers are being “denied” resources because men are refusing to marry-divorce-pay them, and are instead hoarding their financial resources.

It’s for the children!, don’t you know?

JadedGuy said...

It's usually the fat, balding, not-so-dashing men who are creating, producing, providing, and keeping society together, not Biff the Hunk who cleans the pool.

Anonymous said...

Nothing will change until tax receipts get smaller and smaller and smaller.

I guess thats how the need for credit money (implants, chips or whatever you want to call it) will be created.

Too many men going off the map will require the state to find every dollar possible to fund the harridans.

Ferdinand Bardamu said...


Great points on the bachelor tax. Don't be surprised that when the bachelor tax is brought before legislatures, social conservatives sign up to support it along with the feminists. Many conservatives, in their ignorance, blame men for the falling marriage rates, so a bachelor tax will be right up their alley.

Anonymous said...

"You men don't even have the right to shag us any more. ...The Labour Government"

The writer seems to be a Brit.

The Brits are hosed. They don't have a decent military, they're infiltrated by Muslims who have no loyalty to Britain, they can't survive without the USA and the USA is in bad shape.

Britain can only project power by infecting people with STDs. Britain's feminists will drown as rats too stupid to leave the sinking, stinking ship.

Anonymous said...

I can't say I blame women for being so scornful of men. Most of us are simply too weak, horny, and stupid to realize what women are doing to us until we're trapped in a marriage. By that time, it's too late.

Bwec said...

You say: "Most of us are simply too weak, horny, and stupid"

No my friend, you have been taught this about yourself. Men have been taught so many bad things about themselves and their sexuality included. Men are shown as fumbling over their sexuality and willing to sacrifice their needs, honor and integrity to do so. This is what you see in the movies. Male sexuality has been denigrated, humiliated and portrayed as weak and uncontrolable. This is not a man, it is what you have been shown men are...

Anonymous said...

"Britain can only project power by infecting people with STDs. "

Not true. A British sniper killed a gentleman at a distance of two kilometers recently, according to:


ingenium Q said...

The thing is, this isn't even true feminism. It's just manipulation and (excuse me here) "bitchiness" being given a different name.
I don't know about other countries, but here in Australia, children (especially girls) are being taught their "rights", but only in a way that enables more manipulation to occur.
It pretty much all just comes down to human selfishness, and what we can get out of it, while screwing over others in the process. Sadly, it has a lot of momentum, and won't be easily stopped. I don't even know if it can be.

Anonymous said...

I am a woman and this article forgets to mention:
1) a woman's eggs are gone between 45-50 years old or even earlier.
2) studies have shown that a higher percentage of women are unhappy today than they have ever have ever been
3) married women with a good man and children are MUCH happier than single career women who purchase sperm. The sperm can't give you love and physical contact, a scientifically proven human need.
4) women who purchase sperm are settling because they cannot get a man due to bitterness or lack of available men. The softer, more loving women get the men first. Men usually don't pick bitter feminists as a partner unless they have bought into all the female propaganda
5) many lesbians have admitted that they chose the companionship of a women because they could not get a man and HATED being alone
6) this whole article is a lie. During my life I have held the position of a young single woman, a young married woman, a young divorced women, a older divorced woman and a married older woman, and a career woman and a stay at home woman (husband-supported household). I have associated with women of all these groups. I repeat, this article is a big lie. Women who can't get men into the marriage bed pretend they don't want them. Men still like young attractive women and some prefer older attractive women (closer to their age), it's their choice and there are alot of single women of all ages waiting to find a man. Men can and do have a child whenever they want. They don't have to buy eggs. It is older women who buy the eggs because they have become barren due to their age. That is why you feminists are angry because deep down YOU SECRETLY KNOW ALL THIS and you are soooo jealous of your male counterparts, but will NEVER admit it. Whomever wrote this article had described themselves as a very sickening, shallow, selfish undesirable, unloveable person/woman and a user of men in relationships and a user of other people as well. You have a mean undesirable disposition. You are secretly very unhappy and envious. You will probably get a man if you are pretty but with your angry nature, he will just use you for sex and move on to a more loveable and nicer woman when he's done with you and you will end up an old, unmarried, desparate love-starved woman and it will be well-deserved based on your attitude, but do not despair. What you really need is God. God is the only one who can change you and take away your bitterness. God provides love and will transform you from a bitter, unhappy woman to a softer more loveable woman and whether or not you get married, God will heal your bitterness and bring love into you life in some way that you will feel fulfilled and happy.