Monday, February 8, 2010

We Need To Huddle Close To Women For Provision and Protection

I would like to share a letter with my readers I've written to a friend on the state of jobs for the American man.. With the pieces of governmental action and statements put together I've been able to create a picture that will allow me and my countrymen to survive...


Good choice leaving IT Jeremy, I'm doing the same.. Send me an email if you like, I'd like to know what drove you out as well.... A lot of the tech and engineering guys I know are getting out and going the only place left for decent work...healthcare and education....

The best thing is to go where the women are as this is where we devoted the majority of the stimulus package.. "No Country For Burly Men" is an interesting article... Women are the largest voting block so they devoted the money there.
In Joe Biden's address to women he stated that women are the most affected by the recession and that we live in a male chauvinist society..

Robert Reich Obama's cheif economic advisor stated "I am concerned as many of you are, that these jobs not simply go
to high skilled people who are professionals or white male construction workers" "Criteria can be set so that the money goes to others, the long term unemployed, minorities and women."

Many men's jobs are gone for good.. 80% of all jobs lost in this recession are to men. President Obama said regarding the future economy of our country, " “Women are just as likely to be the primary bread earner, if not more likely, than men are today,” ...

BELOW: U.S. Dept of Labor Statistics LARGEST PROJECTED SECTOR OF GROWTH IS THE SERVICE SECTOR.
LARGEST GROWING OCCUPATIONS ARE ENTIRELY FEMALE


They are celebrating that women are now the majority of the workforce and earn 60% of the college degrees. The week long presentation on MSNBC "A Woman's Nation" helped outline the plan to push women into the primary role in the workforce.

The Council On Women and Girls is planning to extend Title IX and Affirmative Action for women to all Science, Technical, Engineering and Mathematics departments in all colleges nation wide. The best idea for men is to huddle close to women for protection and provision.

I've also found that it helps to declare yourself a "diversity candidate" on your online resume. You might also change your name on it to Jeremi which could also help.. You can also tell them that you are 1/5th African American as I believe you can declare your race, they just can not ask. So as I've experienced your contacts will increase.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On a lighter note, do you happen to know where I can get a pair of synthetic breasts along with a breast milk pump that comes will hermetically sealed containers to keep the milk.. I need to get some good equipment in order to breast feed? I'd like to get familiar with some good products. It is important to adapt accordingly to our marginalization... I'm looking forward to being an oppressed stay at home Dad! Women will just be a means to an end like men are today! If we want to leave she will have to send us alimony and child support to support our "choices"!


Man breastfeeding

Nature made the sexes complimentary for a reason, the natural roles of each gender are indispensable. We simply need to fill in the vaccume that women have left. Maria Shriver said on "A Woman's Nation" that men need to contribute to more housework and if we do then we will get more sex.. Me man, all my needs are reduced to one thing, me like sex, me do what woman want! Women have moved away from work in the domestic sphere and apparently are feeling stressed that there is still valuable work to do when the workday is complete... They seem to want men to pick up the extra work load.



Sources:
Vice President Joe Biden informing women that we live in a male cheuvanist society and that women are the primary victims of a recession:

Head Economic Advisor Robert Reich advocates the diversion of the stimulus package to women:

Stimulus Package gets diverted to women: "No Country For Burly Men" by Christina Hoff Sommers:

President Obama states that in the future women will be as and more likely to be the breadwinner:

Video detailing the truth of the matter


I like this (what I think is a woman's) reaction to the article in The Economist magazine. I like it because she feels viscerally that something is not right though she does not know what I have pointed out above in regard to the allocation of the stimulus package. It seems she believes that celebrating the "mancession" as economists are calling it and the loss of male jobs as a victory for women seems to be quite sexist to her:



BlueEyes1 wrote: Dec 31st 2009 1:10 GMT
The title "We did it!" coupled with its subtitle "women … are taking over the workplace" carries with it the sexist implication that men have lost: that they have had something taken from them because they were not competent enough to hold onto it, and that they should therefore feel ashamed. How are men supposed to react? Its unsurprising there is such negative reaction from men in these comments.

"within the next few months women will cross the 50% threshold and become the majority of the American workforce."

If true, this seems like it could be an indication of sexism against males. Females are approximately 50% of the population. On the face of it, in an equal opportunity, non-sexist environment we should expect to see women at about 50% of the American workforce. More than that may be an indicator of sexism against men, but is anyway probably an indicator of a significant problem, and is almost certainly not cause for unchecked celebration (although it is exciting that women have achieved success in the workplace).

As the section in this article "Dealing with the juggle" points out, women make career choices to drop out of the workforce, including raising children. If it is true that more women choose to leave the workforce than men, the conclusion is that we should expect to see women's participation at somewhat less than 50% of the American workforce. The observation that women have exceeded the 50% threshold is an indication that whatever the cause, men are not presently seeing equal employment opportunities. The article seems to agree, since it rather uncharmingly dubs the situation the "mancession". It is disparaging to men that the article's tone is so jubilant, rather than more solemnly reflective.

Replacing sexism against females with sexism against males is not an improvement.

I definitely recommend reading the comments on the article....

http://www.economist.com/node/15174489/comments?page=1

An interesting area of discussion ALPHA WIVES

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

very useful post. I would love to follow you on twitter. By the way, did anyone learn that some chinese hacker had busted twitter yesterday again.

Max said...

Informative and interesting article article....

Women have come a long way, but men and women should operate as a team, with synergy in mind, instead of being threatened by the presence or performance of the opposite sex. We need to increase overall welfare.

The social, cultural, and political attitudes of modern society have enabled women to seize some power from men, despite being treated unfairly by unethical leaders, who continue to reinforce the "glass ceiling." Women understand that fruitful conversations promote sound business relationships and teamwork, thus contributing to an improvement in the bottom line.

Women are usually well organized, as homemakers and professional employees. They often regard their fellow employees as family and take time to ascertain their personal needs. Competition is strange to most women because they were groomed for caring, rather than winning!

Fay Weldon, a writer, stated, “Worry less about what other people think of you, and more about what you think about them.” A former mayor of Ottawa once said, “Whatever women do, they must do twice as well as men to be thought of as half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult!”

Women should focus on a fearless, diplomatic, heads-on approach, instead of being intoxicated by power, intimidated or taken undue advantage of.

For free abridged versions of my books on leadership, ethics, teamwork, motivation, women, bullying and sexual harassment, trade unions, etc., write to crespin79@hotmail.com.

Maxwell Pinto, Business Author
http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/Management-TidbitsForTheNewMillenium.html

Anonymous said...

Dude, if it gets bad enough, we can just legally declare ourselves to be women. The femibitches shot themselves in the foot like that when they made an alliance with the gays. Now anybody can claim to be whatever sex they want based on nothing but their feeeeelings.

They'd close that loophole pretty quick if millions of straight white men were applying for women's government entitlements, though,but then the gays would be heinously pissed.

Win/win for us.

We have to break their alliances so that the feminist core is vulnerable.

CaliTex1990 said...

@Max: Good points there.

Women lording over men is NO improvement. Not that it happens that often, but truly, teamwork is ALWAYS the best option.

And yes, most ladies are still raised to be caring and not competitive.

Thanks for being a reasonable voice out there when there aren't many at all in the 'men's movement', and this goes for feminists too.

Bwec said...

Hello Max,

How have women been "being treated unfairly by unethical leaders"?
who.."continue to reinforce the "glass ceiling."

Max, the "wage gap" is actually calculated by adding up the wages of all the men and women and the workforce and finding the disparity. As a whole of the population women make less.

Now, do you know why women earn less?

Max your advocation of such bigotry is deplorable.... “Whatever women do, they must do twice as well as men to be thought of as half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult!”

It reminds me of the button I saw a girl wear on INTERNATIONAL WOMENS MONTH. Saying "What does it take to do the job of 3 men....1 woman."

I've heard all these female supremacist things, women say them with impunity in public places. I do not believe females are superior nor do I believe they should be given unequal protection under law..

Women are our competition now...

Anonymous said...

"Women have come a long way, but men and women should operate as a team, with synergy in mind, instead of being threatened by the presence or performance of the opposite sex."

Utter idealist nonsense. Men and women aren't a team. They are in conflict. Isn't it obvious that women don't want to co-operate with men? What might men and women "work as a team" towards? The fantastical goal of "equality"? Don't make me laugh.

Crystallised patriarchy or matriarchy (what women are agitating for) pushes the conflict from view, but it nonetheless will always be there.

It's an Us and Them scenario, a Zero Sum Game. Women and feminists worked this out a long time ago.

Anonymous said...

"Crystallised patriarchy or matriarchy (what women are agitating for) pushes the conflict from view, but it nonetheless will always be there."

Because sex-based subjugation and hierarchies are normalized and as such not noticed.

Anonymous said...

"And yes, most ladies are still raised to be caring and not competitive."

Absolute rubbish. Classic feminist counter-reality soundbyte to keep up the appearance of non-existent "oppression of women".

Anonymous said...

"Thanks for being a reasonable voice out there when there aren't many at all in the 'men's movement', and this goes for feminists too."

Why should we care for the judgement of feminist-sympathizers such as yourself??

Any slight opposition to feminism will be called "being unreasonable" by sympathizers such as yourself. You're basically a fascist whose opinions are 100% set, who holds views counter to reality for ideological reasons.. You're judgement, because of that, is irrelevant.

Bwec said...

Thank you for the commentary Anon : )

Ryan S. said...

In many couples, this situation has come about simply because there is no work for the husband. The wife is a nurse, teacher, librarian or government worker who makes less but has a stable employer. The husband made more but the jobs are disappearing at an alarming rate.

If you like this situation, thank NAFTA and free trade.

Looking at your chart on the largest growing jobs we are in for some trouble ahead as women realize what they have done by their social policies. True the majority of the stimulus package was devoted to women in healthcare and education.

Women it seems are adept at looking out for their own welfare only, thus their social policies reflect likewise....SOON ENOUGH WOMEN WILL BE STRONG AND INDEPENDENT BECAUSE THERE WILL BE NO MEN TO SUPPORT THEM...THIS WILL ONLY RESULT IN RAMPANT MISANDRY i.e. the contempt and hatred of men and boys...

Bwec said...

I like this persons view:


"Today women can get (respect) from jobs and also from being good mothers, being attractive, running efficient homes. Men’s source of status and prestige is singular: their jobs."

People like to believe that it's men's egos that make us feel threated by women who have more territory and resources than we do but no one has ever questioned why males are so driven to produce something...

Why because women don't value us for anything else.. Not for being pretty, not for our fertile potential, not for playing a supportive househusband role NOTHING....

Men are designed to acquire territory and resources, utilize, build and fix resources effectively to support life...

The reason the new economy will fail is because it's an economy built on "social policy", "equality laws" protecting unequally by gender and race. It is a creation of government and not a true free formed system but one that is forced....

Anonymous said...

We should finally get rid of the "man" made myth about woman being the 'weaker" sex!

There never was a biological reason for women to cede the role of either the principal or even sole bread winner to her "man".

With increasing education and career aspirations, women are no longer willing (nor should be) to be seen as mere supplements to family income or as mere "trophies" to provide an upscale social ambiance for their more ambitious husbands. Add to this development the traits of women, greater industry, diligence and patience, the traditional stereotype of a woman being dumb and merely interested in latching on to a prospective husband (preferably wealthy one) collapses.

Yet, the path to ambitious career oriented women is tortuous. The demands of managing office work and children will be taxing, made worse by an uncooperative or resentful husband.

If the husband is a loser, there is every likelihood of domestic violence spurred by jealousy, resulting in messy divorce. While the success of women in all walks of life is welcome, it is a wake up call for men to shed their unwarranted superiority complexes, pitch in willingly in raising children and running the home and be emotionally supportive of their more successful wives.

Bwec said...

You say: "If the husband is a loser, there is every likelihood of domestic violence spurred by jealousy"


Ohhhh I get it, it is common place for men to get their "fragile male ego" bruised and in response attack women and beat them......Wow lady, you really are a hateful misandrist aren't you...Your writing stinks of contempt and resentment for men and boys.....

You are better off just to stay away from men.

When the gynocracy enacts welfare to all single women it should be a woman only tax system...men...we will have no obligation to women, children or family...

As you wish, men will no longer have any invested interest in women but fucking them and then going our own way...

I am glad you are wishing for this as are many women...I feel it will be poetic justice when you find out you have slain the very source of our communal wellbeing....

It is then that you will be forced to really be "strong and independent" and I can tell you one thing, you won't fare well as a man when it comes to this and all bets are off...

Anonymous said...

Nice brief and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thank you seeking your information.

Anonymous said...

Well your article helped me altogether much in my college assignment. Hats afar to you send, choice look ahead in the direction of more related articles soon as its united of my pick question to read.

Anonymous said...

All women are latent or actual anti-male sexists. Thusly, women are the enemy. They fight us on all fronts, now it is time for men to fight back.

Anonymous said...

"Women have come a long way, but men and women should operate as a team, with synergy in mind, instead of being threatened by the presence or performance of the opposite sex."

Why is it that pro-feminists recommend pacifism, throwing up the white flag, "working as a team", when men are being systematically abused and disenfranchized.

Where was your call for moderation in the 1970s and 1980s, when feminism were fighting men and causing as much division as possible? You are a hypocrite. Enough of your feministic suggestions of "pacifism" when it suits you.

Anonymous said...

"Women lording over men is NO improvement. Not that it happens that often, but truly, teamwork is ALWAYS the best option."

No. Women ruled that out when they climbed onboard the feminist project. Women demonstrate their disinterest in "teamwork" every day of the week. Men must respond in kind.

Anonymous said...

"And yes, most ladies are still raised to be caring and not competitive."

Absolutely incorrect (not that it's of any interest to men's movement activists; that's a feminist concerned).

Women are raised to be competitive, especially against men.

You are spouting feminist cliched lies.

Anonymous said...

"I do not believe females are superior nor do I believe they should be given unequal protection under law.."

I believe they should be given unequal protection and have unequal status under the law. Because if we don't do it to them they'll do it to us; and you can guarantee that.

Anonymous said...

"There never was a biological reason for women to cede the role of either the principal or even sole bread winner to her "man"."

No - but that system was good for men and that's what matters for US. Why should we only consider options that are only in YOUR interests. FUCK YOU feminist.

"Add to this development the traits of women, greater industry, diligence and patience"

Exceptional traits in woman outside of the norm, especially in a feminist environment. The typical female is a greedy bloodsucking compulsive liar with no sense of morality, and she brings this into the workplace.

Yet, the path to ambitious career oriented women is tortuous.

Not true, and why should men care.

"The demands of managing office work and children will be taxing, made worse by an uncooperative or resentful husband."

All husbands are uncooperative and resentful, really? Nice blanket statement there, woman.

"If the husband is a loser, there is every likelihood of domestic violence spurred by jealousy, resulting in messy divorce."

Husbands are ALWAYS losers in divorce because WOMEN RIGGED THE SYSTEM. Furthermore, WOMEN tell lies of domestic violence to get more cash and property, the materialistic usurpers that they are.

"it is a wake up call for men to shed their unwarranted superiority complexes"

How about you women shed your enormous egos and superiority complexes for a change.

"pitch in willingly in raising children and running the home and be emotionally supportive of their more successful wives."

Quit being condescending to men, we don't need your judgement or advice, woman. How about you obey our judgement and advice for a change?

And didn't you feminist women say that "DEPENDENCY IS NOT A HEALTHY STATE OF BEING" in the 1970s? Oh I guess that only applies to women. I see you are happy to see men in dependent roles. Hypocrite woman - as usual.

Go to a feminist site and spread your lies and fallacies there. Us men have been listening to your unadulterated worthless rubbish for long enough. It's time to put ourselves first for a change.

Anonymous said...

"There never was a biological reason for women to cede the role of either the principal or even sole bread winner to her "man"."

No - but that system was good for men and that's what matters for US. Why should we only consider options that are only in YOUR interests. FUCK YOU feminist.

"Add to this development the traits of women, greater industry, diligence and patience"

Exceptional traits in woman outside of the norm, especially in a feminist environment. The typical female is a greedy bloodsucking compulsive liar with no sense of morality, and she brings this into the workplace.

Yet, the path to ambitious career oriented women is tortuous.

Not true, and why should men care.

"The demands of managing office work and children will be taxing, made worse by an uncooperative or resentful husband."

All husbands are uncooperative and resentful, really? Nice blanket statement there, woman.

"If the husband is a loser, there is every likelihood of domestic violence spurred by jealousy, resulting in messy divorce."

Husbands are ALWAYS losers in divorce because WOMEN RIGGED THE SYSTEM. Furthermore, WOMEN tell lies of domestic violence to get more cash and property, the materialistic usurpers that they are.

"it is a wake up call for men to shed their unwarranted superiority complexes"

How about you women shed your enormous egos and superiority complexes for a change.

"pitch in willingly in raising children and running the home and be emotionally supportive of their more successful wives."

Quit being condescending to men, we don't need your judgement or advice, woman. How about you obey our judgement and advice for a change?

And didn't you feminist women say that "DEPENDENCY IS NOT A HEALTHY STATE OF BEING" in the 1970s? Oh I guess that only applies to women. I see you are happy to see men in dependent roles. Hypocrite woman - as usual.

Go to a feminist site and spread your lies and fallacies there. Us men have been listening to your unadultered wortheless rubbish for long enough. It's time to put ourselves first for a change.

This society needs less Gynocentrism (which your posts epitomizes) and more freedoms for men.

Anonymous said...

Question: why do all women think the same?

Why do they all output the same gynocentric women-first double-speak that the feminist cunt above did?

Anonymous said...

Women are weaker than men, by design so just accept it. It says so in the bible. But don't take my word for it, just open you eyes. Women prove their innate weakness every single day. One sure sign of strength is accepting your limitations and being able to take no for an answer. Tell a woman no and get ready for tantrums, withholding of sex, manipulations,coercion, threats and various forms of sabotage.

American/western women are the most pampered, privileged, spoiled, self-centered, self-serving, undisciplined, entitled, disingenuous and lazy creatures in history. And how do they thank the men who made all this possible?: By stabbing them in the back while turning a deaf ear to their suffering. Heaven help the man who "hooks up" with an American/western woman. Feminism has turned them into heartless parasites. BOYCOTT THEM!!!