Women Mounting What Could Be Final Assault Upon Men and Boys!

The Communist Women's Party is planning what could be the final blow to men and boys!

The Women's Party feminists MUST BE STOPPED BY ANY AND ALL MEANS NECESSARY, hopefully this will not become violent. Make no mistake WE ARE AT WAR with women as a socio-political class with separate class interests! Women have made "the personal political" as they have promised. The gender war is in full swing!

There is not much time left! Men must mount a counter attack immediately, hopefully a peaceful one... This is something that needs to be taken VERY SERIOUSLY! This information will be relayed to senior command elements in the Men's Movement immediately! It is suspected that Women's Feminists plan to starve men off at both ends, educationally as you will see below and economically with THE DIVERSION OF THE STIMULUS PACKAGE which has already been done. This is a classic pincher maneuver accompanied by a rear guard action assault. It is up to all of you to sound the alarm. Do not be lulled into complacency, Women's Feminists are mounting what could be the final blow to men and boys in our colleges!

below is a graph created by extrapolated data from: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_258.asp



During this time Women's Party leaders plan to mount a classic rear guard action to defend the Bradly Amendment at all costs. This Amendment makes it virtually impossible for men to lower their forced labor payments of alimony woman support to women who have abandoned their family during and prior to what economists have labeled the "Mancession". 80% of all jobs lost in this recession have been to men! The goal is to push men out of educational institutions and the workforce simultaneously then immediately and over time through such methods of cruel attrition, capture and arrest all the marginalized and displaced males who are hopefully unable to support their ex wives and estranged children. Make no mistake, these men who fail to give what remaining money they have left to the women who left them in no-fault divorce WILL BE PLACED INSIDE OF JAIL CAGES! At this time my very own brother is getting his unemployment garnished and given to his ex-wife who is employed!

This is a classic three pronged assault! Gentlemen, your adversaries are no fools and are masters at manipulation of our social fabric and governmental social policy. This is not a drill! Man your battle stations!

Gentlemen, we have been HIT HARD already! Women's Feminist Leaders have inflicted heavy casualties! Do not break ranks and retreat, we must regroup and counter attack immediately!



And now a special review of the feminist intelligence report known as "A Woman's Nation" has been brought to my attention.

Psychological Warfare operations against men and boys is under way and is the first stage of the assault. It is designed to soften up strategic targets, embolden, empower and swell the ranks of female forces while demoralizing the male enemy. The report advocates plans for the second stage educational element of the assault upon males. It is speculated that the underlying goal is to eradicate opportunities for males in some of the last places males still reside in our colleges.

A SPECIAL REPORT::
------

Shriver's "A Woman's Nation" Misses the Mark
-By Mona Charen

Maria Shriver's new report, "A Woman's Nation Changes Everything," has received a full dress media rollout. We are invited to examine the changes in women's lives over the past several decades and to deplore, as usual, the obstacles to full equality that women supposedly face. Published in cooperation with the Center for American Progress, "A Woman's Nation" claims to be reckoning with the new era but arguably fails to grapple with the most profound challenges to women (as well as children and men).

Some of what's in this report is a recycling of long-discredited data. Heather Boushey, for example, regurgitates the statistic that women only earn 77 cents on the dollar compared with men. But as the Hudson Institute's Diana Furchtgott-Roth and other economists have shown, this number conceals more than it reveals. It is only true on average. But when you begin to compare like with like, the discrepancies narrow considerably. Comparing men and women who both work 40 hours per week, for example, reduces the pay gap by 10 cents per hour. You have to look carefully at what is being compared. Among workers labeled "full time," hours worked by men tend to exceed hours worked by women. When men and women performing the same job are compared -- whether supermarket checker or first-year associate at a law firm -- the pay gap nearly disappears.

"A Woman's Nation" declares in one breath that the "war of the sexes is over" but in the next launches a broadside about women's educational opportunities. It requires some ingenuity to complain that women are educationally shortchanged, when, as even the chapter's author, Mary Ann Mason, acknowledges, "Women today receive 62 percent of college associate's degrees, 57 percent of bachelor's degrees, 60 percent of all master's degrees, half of all professional degrees (law and medicine) and just under half of all Ph.D.s." But there is a problem lurking beneath the surface of this evident success. Though they dominate higher education, too many women are still choosing "traditional female majors" like education, health care (including nursing), and psychology.

Some people look at these data and see free people making free choices. The report doesn't see it that way. Some unseen hand (the patriarchy?) is herding women students into psychology class and blocking their enrollment in engineering and computer science. Women shouldn't cluster in the "helping professions," the report complains, because those jobs don't pay as well as some others. That women may prefer these fields anyway is not considered. Yes, Mason admits, women choose fields that offer job flexibility so that they can fulfill family responsibilities. But that just shows how much the world must change to make these tradeoffs unnecessary.

The solution to the educational "problem," the report argues -- and here we come to the nub -- is more government action. "Our government has already started" to tackle these problems, the report chirps, through laws like Title IX. But Big Brother must do more! Title IX must be used "as a tool to level the playing field for women in the sciences, just as it has done successfully for sports." In other words, schools must be coerced into "equalizing" these programs or risk the loss of federal support.

(THIS PLAN AGAINST MEN AND BOYS HAS SUPPORT AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. HERE: Women's leaders discuss the STEM program and Title IX "women first" policy. The goal is to force this "women first" policy upon any and all places males still preside in our colleges! Women's Party Feminist leaders are also seeking the reauthorization and elemental advantages be given to women in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act)

There's so much for benevolent government to do. The U.S., the report laments, "is the only industrialized country without any requirement that employers provide paid family leave." Employers must be required by law to offer generous family leave, flexible working hours, and other benefits. The government must "increase support to families for child care, early education and elder care to help working parents cope with their multiple responsibilities." Would that be the same government that is already trillions in debt?

Hundreds of pages, lots of photos and charts, and it's the same old song. It completely misses the most important fact about modern women's lives -- the decline of family stability. And not just women's lives. The decline of marital stability and the rise of unmarried parenting (currently almost 40 percent of children are born to unmarried parents) has not only been a catastrophe for children, it has also made combining work and family harder than ever. Just at the moment women entered the workforce en masse, marriages -- so essential to providing stability to home life -- unraveled.

The solution, says the Shriver report, is for our "social insurance" programs to "recognize" how family life is changing and increase benefits for a range of domestic needs. See how it works? The more that families disintegrate, the more demands are made upon the government to step in to fill the gaps. That's a downward spiral from which there may be no escape.

-End of Emergency Action Message-

http://www.redcounty.com/shrivers-a-womans-nation-misses-mark

Women Who Make Men Rape

I've been studying a bit into criminal pathologies lately and came across a some very interesting information.. In todays culture, inundated with misandry one could be led to believe that men are born monsters.

Did you know that over 98 per cent of the men in the United States today have never been convicted of any violent crime or served time in prison? That, even though the U.S. imprisons a higher percentage of its citizens than any other nation, over 98 per cent of our men have never been convicted of rape, child molestation, assault, battery, breaking and entering, or any kind of violence? And almost half of the men who do land in prison are convicted of non-violent crimes (usually drug possession)?
-(A thanks to Robert W.)

Many young men and women have no idea that men are good. I wish no hell like I endured in my Women's Studies class in college on any of my readers though I can say that the experience emboldened my spirit and made me think.

I set out to find the answer, to prove that I as a man am not a monster and that somehow marriage was beneficial to women. (Though marriage was not abolished as early feminists sought to do, they simply changed the laws to no fault divorce, default female child custody and the forceful transference of the the male provider role to women outside of marriage through alimony (woman support) and child support)Essentially the idea was to reduce female liabilities in marriage to zero, displace her liabilities upon the shoulders of the man making marriage obsolete & superfluous at best.

"I find myself increasingly shocked at the unthinking and automatic rubbishing of men which is now so part of our culture that it is hardly even noticed... I was in a class of nine and 10-year-olds, girls and boys, and this young woman was telling these kids that the reason for wars was the innately violent nature of men. You could see the little girls, fat with complacency and conceit while the little boys sat there crumpled, apologising for their existence, thinking this was going to be the pattern of their lives… This kind of thing is happening in schools all over the place and no one says a thing. It has become a kind of religion that you can't criticise because then you become a traitor to the great cause, which I am not. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests. Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it is time they did."

- Doris Lessing, 2001


So this is for you Doris and those little boys who were unable to defend themselves:

I had no idea that men fought wars to gain territory and resources and that male animals mark off territory and resources as well..Did you know that men have twice as many sweat glands per square inch than women do? I realized that it was a beautiful thing that all the lines drawn between countries were drawn in the blood of men. I realized that women are the unappreciative benefactors of male male competition and the fruits of male labor and sacrifice. Then I discovered a little more about the male brain and reward circuits we have for doing so!

WOW upon further investigation I found that male chimpanzees conduct warfare as well. I even discovered that ants invade and attack other ant nests. May the most healthy, resourcefully successful and therefore numerically superior ant civilization win! Looking further I realized that many if not most male animals are born with weapons and horns or at very least compete in a different way, a way which can be extremely violent among each other. I've seen them fight and use these weapons as well!

I realized that I was not alone, that I am not a horrible person like my Women's Studies class said I was (Said I was 2). I found that I was different, I was a man and this was ok! I learned that being a man was something that women did not understand and from the words of feminist science they did not accept, like or even hated.

What angered me most was the impending danger I felt to my love of women. Not only did I become emboldened by my need to defend myself but also by my need to defend my view of women. I became afraid of hating women and was not willing to accept this. Men's and Father's Rights was my way out, understanding myself as a man was my saving grace.. I was not so sure the other males in the class were able to save themselves... I wanted to save them to. I didn't know all the answers at the time but I knew that the body of academic knowledge that women thinkers had amassed about me was a lie.. You see, The class was called "The Psychology of Women" and was hosted in the Science wing of my college..

This was about 5 years ago. Naturally, being fresh out of high school, I was nieve, trusting and impressionable. I thought I was in a Science class at the time and it blew me away that this is what modern science thinks about men.

The course was filled with ideological inferences. Though many tenets of feminist thought were not always stated directly and implicitly they were unequivocally alluded to and inferred.

Naturally, if the feminist saying "All men are potential rapists" was true that could lead to the saying that "All women are potential prostitutes" as true. I refuse to believe such vitriol. I refuse to view humanity in such a light. I would like to champion my beloved fellow men and and beloved women to stand on a higher moral plain, a higher standard for intellectual discourse and understanding.

Again, this is for you Doris, thank you for defending the honor of men:

"There is an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men - 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979) and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993). A strong case for the need to identify female perpetrators can be found in Table 4, which presents the findings from a study of adolescent sex offenders by O'Brien (1989). Male adolescent sex offenders abused by "females only" chose female victims almost exclusively."

Source: The Canadian Children's Rights Council

http://www.canadiancrc.com/female_sexual_predators_awareness.aspx