tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post8806457507018414114..comments2023-10-31T05:38:51.597-07:00Comments on Rebuking Feminism: Anatomy of Matriarchy & Gynocentric ConsummationBwechttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comBlogger67125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-72501533604266714282012-08-08T17:13:49.528-07:002012-08-08T17:13:49.528-07:00Central power and it's social hierarchy requir...Central power and it's social hierarchy requires gynergy evacuation. It's continuation is contingent upon the reversal of all family hierarchy and the inherent atomization it leads to. Only the illusion of being whole and not the sum of the parts can be exuded. The concerted effort to eliminate the natural economic unit, the family, is why real progress has grinded to a halt. All according to plan? Artificial bottle necking? Abiotic territorialization of the biotic? The rejection of the negentropic father principle allows the state to gain CONTROL over all propagative rights of all LIFE in general. Welcome to our gynocentric pathocratic scientistic dictatorship. Drink your kook-aid.<br />AndrewAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08007272399531611294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-13964001840113845352011-09-29T21:15:20.841-07:002011-09-29T21:15:20.841-07:00There has been a dramatic decrease in male fertili...There has been a dramatic decrease in male fertility (sperm count and sperm quality) over the last 50 years concentrated mostly in the Western Industrialized nations. If the rate of decrease continues at the current rate, by the year 2100, average male fertility rates will reach sterile(non-fertile) levels ! Is this related to feminism and the affects of the same as outlined in the original article? There is no absolute scientific known reason for the same. However, this decline began with the onset of feminism in the Western World such that feminism might be the cause of the same. If it is, the extinction of the human race might result from male infertility resulting from the affects of feminism!Marcus Aureliushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12356156676523760830noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-30978985250179888742010-05-08T11:44:39.328-07:002010-05-08T11:44:39.328-07:00TrKing Says: “They don’t love us, they desire to b...TrKing Says: “They don’t love us, they desire to be either loved by us or supported by us. They don’t desire to love us.”<br /><br />Absolutely, men are the primary purveyors of romantic love and expression. It is men who show love and devotion and culturally express it in poetry, song, flowers, gifts etc you name it…<br /><br />Romance is something men do and create, not women. Men love, women desire to be desired and loved. Even the act of marriage proposal is a one way transaction of male display of love and commitment and the female is the recipient. Why a man would do this voluntarily now a days is by ignorance and brainwashing or the simple fact that males are willing to sacrifice everything, including their own lives in order to reproduce…<br /><br />Being worthy of reproductive access to a female is a strong biological imperative of males. Feminism is about exploiting this imperative and minimizing their cost to benefit ratio.<br /><br />A woman’s idea of creating romance is creating a scenario which allows or illicits male love or desire. Women love male love but they do not love and appreciate men for the simple fact that we exist. They do not feel compelled to do anything for males and certainly not to provide or protect us or even look after our welfare.<br /><br />Any desire females have to look after male welfare in a relationship or as a social groups is indeed for gynocentric reasons. Females have no desire to look after the wellbeing of males as a group and indeed males don’t even feel the desire to do so..<br /><br />Men are a class divided and increasingly further divided by the advent of a new male, the government husband with which we can not compete.. Women know this and have a very close loving relationship with the government husband. This is what women meant when they exclaimed “The personal is political” Our founding fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew how political the personal has become. Feminism is all about exploiting the cost\ benefit in relation to any exchange or interaction with males both socially, politically and economically.<br /><br />Women don’t want to need men and it bothers them intensely that they need us for anything and thus this is why all women are feminists. Female empowerment, liberation, independence etc are all about not needing men<br /><br />or making what is needed from men transferable to them without reciprocal obligation. It is also about control over property and creating laws which legislate and increase female bodily sovereignty and property value and ensure ownership of not only her body, but the body of a child and the body of men and the fruits of our labor….<br /><br />To women men are simply a means to an end for herself and what she sees as “her” offspring. By law women have no commitments to men even after divorce…… Females think of themselves as inherently desirable, valuable and worthy.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-90783110968406589852010-05-06T22:25:14.706-07:002010-05-06T22:25:14.706-07:00"When I was in college we were taught in more..."When I was in college we were taught in more than one class that men are not needed as part of a family and that a family can be anything, including two men or two women."<br /><br />you are disgusting.seaunicornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16852802772312563246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-22019483379496621472010-05-05T23:27:29.372-07:002010-05-05T23:27:29.372-07:00YOU SAY: "I don't believe your 90% statis...YOU SAY: "I don't believe your 90% statistic is anything but your opinion, even if it were true, refusing to care for ones child is an abomination."<br /><br /><br />The number varies but it is in fact 80-90% of men are not given the right to custody or even shared custody of their children. This is reflected in child support and woman support alimony data.<br /><br />79.6% of custodial mothers receive a support award<br /><br />46.9% of non-custodial mothers totally default on support.<br /><br />26.9% of non-custodial fathers totally default on support.<br /><br /><br />[Technical Analysis Paper No. 42 - U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services - Office of Income Security Policy]<br /><br />40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the fathers visitation to punish their ex-spouse.<br /><br />["Frequency of Visitation" by Sanford Braver, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry]<br /><br />50% of mothers see no value in the fathers continued contact with his children.<br /><br />["Surviving the Breakup" by Joan Berlin Kelly]<br /><br />YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THE MORE MEANINGFUL CONTACT MEN HAVE WITH THEIR OWN OFFSPRING THE MORE LIKELY THEY ARE TO PAY SUPPORT....<br /><br />Personally I would like to see changes in the law that allow men more meaningful contact with their children. Currently, even when men share the role of supporting the child equally in joint custody, they are still required to support the woman's ability to do so 90.2% of the time.<br /><br />The law through it's practice says that women are unable to support themselves and that men MUST SUPPORT WOMEN FINANCIALLY WHETHER SHE IS A MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY OR NOT. <br /><br />90.2% of fathers with joint shared custody pay the support due.<br /><br />79.1% of fathers with visitation privileges pay the support due.<br /><br />44.5% of fathers with no visitation pay the support due.<br /><br />37.9% of fathers are denied any visitation.<br /><br />66% of all support not paid by non-custodial fathers is due to the inability to pay.<br /><br />[1988 Census "Child Support and Alimony: 1989 Series" P-60, No. 173 p.6-7, and "U.S. General Accounting Office Report" GAO/HRD-92-39FS January 1992]<br /><br />Here is another interesting fact....<br /><br />63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes.<br /><br />To learn more on fatherless children please see:<br /><br />Lindsey the below is for you to see as well....<br /><br />http://rebukingfeminism.blogspot.com/2009/01/fatherless-homes-and-affect.htmlBwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-59019424864788557872010-05-05T21:32:39.582-07:002010-05-05T21:32:39.582-07:00YOU SAY: "Children are not something you can ...YOU SAY: "Children are not something you can just throw away because the court didn't cater to you."<br /><br />Again sir, I don't think you understand, being a father is not a selfish act. I will say it again, the right to meaningful contact with your own children is not a selfish act. <br /><br />Children need fathers and yes if you insist polarizing the issue fathers need children as well.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-29096068689685627542010-05-05T21:30:09.202-07:002010-05-05T21:30:09.202-07:00YOU SAY: "It isn't about what you want it...YOU SAY: "It isn't about what you want it is about the children"<br /><br />Absolutely and children NEED FATHERS.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-22312242356263798352010-05-05T21:27:47.083-07:002010-05-05T21:27:47.083-07:00YOU SAY: "What a depraved attitude. Although ...YOU SAY: "What a depraved attitude. Although I don't believe your 90% statistic is anything but your opinion, even if it were true, refusing to care for ones child is an abomination. I would gladly see such men in prison."<br /><br />Children are not a product sir and they are not property. As such "care for ones child" is not something that should be a bill every month along with other bills. <br /><br />Fatherhood IS A GOD GIVEN RIGHT. Men should have the right to shared custody of the child and meaningful contact with the dear children. <br /><br />In no circumstance should men lose this right BY DEFAULT. In no circumstance should it be that meaningful contact and the opportunity to support a child be turned into a capitalized liability.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-20413764572486682722010-05-05T08:20:58.996-07:002010-05-05T08:20:58.996-07:00Cloud said: “Exactly. Men don’t consume nearly as ...Cloud said: “Exactly. Men don’t consume nearly as much as women. Books, movies, television, politicians, ect. They are all tailored to what women want.”<br /><br />Absolutely, which invariably means catering to the female ego, yes that’s right I said it, the female ego which unlike the male ego that is fed by the affirmation that he is useful in some way to women, a group or culture at large, the female ego stems from her inherent biological value for the simple fact that she exists. As such women are inherently valuable and worthy of male attention which when unchecked by a higher moral and cultural reasoning leads to a deeply cultivated narcissism and sense of entitlement that is absolutely voracious.<br /><br />When expressed economically, socially and politically female consumption of resources in relation to “what women want” becomes dominate and pronounced. Increasing female influence in these realms of social and moral culture leads only to consummation of the very system and its supporting construct.<br /><br />To me anyway it is quite clear that females are absolutely voracious when it comes to providing for, pampering, tending to and ensuring their own protection at the expense of everyone else, especially males.<br /><br />Women make or are the dominate influence in 80% of all consumer purchases.<br /><br />As a result “what women want” takes center stage in our defunct feminist culture… There are week long segments of news devoted to “what women want”<br /><br />Gynocentric, matrifocal, matriarchal and feminized culture is the result… I would like to remind you that no matriarchal civilization has ever survived for long…. These structures by nature become self entitled, receptive and are quickly enveloped by their own consummation.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-17138912745815026282010-05-05T04:24:34.650-07:002010-05-05T04:24:34.650-07:00YOU SAY: "I certainly have not been disenfran...YOU SAY: "I certainly have not been disenfranchised or rendered irrelevant."<br /><br /> All men have been disenfranchised and made expendable from the family, it's the law. <br /><br />"nor have I suffered any form of loss from any advance women have made."<br /><br /> You may not, but try going to college or joining a sports program. Try getting a promotion at work when there is an advancement or hiring freeze upon men so that women may advance. Try being one of the 80% of all jobs lost that have been to men in this recession. Try being one of these men standing by and watching as the Stimulus Package is devoted to women upon their demand. .See: <br /><br />http://rebukingfeminism.blogspot.com/2009/09/no-country-for-burly-men-feminists.html<br /> <br />loss and handicaps placed upon men is the law.<br /><br />Try being subject to the no-fault divorce women lobbied for and the change in family law. <br /><br /> "nor have I lost any standing or status as husband and father."<br /><br /> The status and standing of husband and father have been denigrated in social culture and by law. When I was in college we were taught in more than one class that men are not needed as part of a family and that a family can be anything, including two men or two women.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-70353915753628366432010-05-04T18:42:29.792-07:002010-05-04T18:42:29.792-07:00I am working on watching your video at the moment....I am working on watching your video at the moment. I am using hotel wi fi at the moment because as I said I am in Alaska onn business. It is taking a while to load I will comment later after I have watched it.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-77835588305989618882010-05-04T18:30:33.074-07:002010-05-04T18:30:33.074-07:00You make an inept attempt at mockery with the foll...<b> You make an inept attempt at mockery with the following:<br /><br />"Attention men, the reason all of your health indicators are on the decline is for one reason and one reason alone, your failure to "man-up" because you are "weak and stupid"." </b><br /><br />Actually I was reffering to suicide, and yes it would be a great public service to point out that if you commit suicide, barring certain mental illnesses, you are weak and stupid.<br /><br />It is also absolutely fair to say if you do not vote you are weak and stupid.<br /><br />It is also fair to say if you do not support your children you are weak and inhuman.<br /><br /><br />As to your definition of matriarchy, I was clear on that, I just don't believe it exists. You have in no way demonstrated that it does. You have referenced a few and relatively minor injustices that do need fixed, but you then go on to employ sweeping generalizations and a fair amount of paranoia to create this fantasy of a gynocentric society. <br /><br />As I have said we are clearly dealing with different women. Or more likely dealing with women in general but relating to them in far different ways. I certainly have not been disenfranchised or rendered irrelevant, nor have I suffered any form of loss from any advance women have made. I have not suffered any emasculation in my relationships, nor have I lost any standing or staus as husband and father. I can say the same about my circle of male friends as well. <br /><br />I do see that I agree with you about the right and wrong of several issues but unlike you I see it as but a small symptom of much bigger political problems, and I certainly have no evidence that it is causing any actual crisis.<br /><br />Yes, my voting habits both on issues and candidates are of a sort that would help allieviate the problems you are concerned with. That is however due to principal and not because there is some sort of evident conspiracy against men.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-65964383980068244592010-05-04T18:19:48.393-07:002010-05-04T18:19:48.393-07:00Sir you are clearly misinformed about "women ...Sir you are clearly misinformed about "women first" laws and Title IX specifically..<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqLeg7eunsA<br /><br />Take a good look at the comments section... This is one of many references that I have to the destruction women first laws have caused to opportunities for boys and men.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-52881107137358392972010-05-04T18:17:15.408-07:002010-05-04T18:17:15.408-07:00You say:
Yes, child support is actually woman supp...You say:<br /><b>Yes, child support is actually woman support alimony. Second fatherhood is not something that can be turned into money. 4 days a month is the standard "visitation" time and I do not call this meaningful contact with the child.</b><br /><br />What a depraved attitude. Although I don't believe your 90% statistic is anything but your opinion, even if it were true, refusing to care for ones child is an abomination. I would gladly see such men in prison.<br /><br />It is the height of selfishness to say that "I don't get the visitation I want so my child needs to suffer for it. I'll just run off and start another family and if my new wife leaves I will make those kids suffer as well."<br /><br /> It isn't about what you want it is about the children. If you would whine about meaningful contact while not supporting your own children then you do not deserve meaningful contact with anyone but a cellmate.<br /><br />My wife is a strong independant woman and is fully capable of matching my income but if she were to leave me not only would I be willing to contribute to my childrens support I would insist upon it. Although I have no doubts about my ability to acquire meaningful contact, even if I were denied any contact I would still insist on contributing to their well being. Children are not something you can just throw away because the court didn't cater to you. They are children and any man worth the name would do anything for them even give up something as trivial as "the fruits of his labors." A man worthy of the name would give his children his entire life and even give up his life and not even pause to regret it.<br /><br />I would like to see fairer representation in custody but my primary concern would be my children. More to the point I doubt your statistics and nothing you say applies to any of the divorced men of my acquaintance who have excellent involvment and relationships with their children, and have in my opinion gotten a pretty fair deal on support.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-9563067699688984202010-05-04T18:11:57.066-07:002010-05-04T18:11:57.066-07:00YOU SAY: "your imagined matriarchy"
Yo...YOU SAY: "your imagined matriarchy"<br /><br /> You don't seem to get it, matrifocal social structure can be explicitly defined which I've done a rather good job of doing in my blog. <br /><br />Do you not understand what matrifocal means. You need to understand what matriarchy means before you call female centered social structure and the legislated expendable and disposable role of husband and father a myth.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-60908804672041077462010-05-04T18:08:23.105-07:002010-05-04T18:08:23.105-07:00YOU SAY: "Anyone who committs suicide male or...YOU SAY: "Anyone who committs suicide male or female is weak and stupid. Likewise those who refuse to vote are weak and stupid."<br /><br /> WOW, way to turn on your thinking cap! Your findings should be published. Maybe you could be President. You could start a public service campaign. <br /><br />"Attention men, the reason all of your health indicators are on the decline is for one reason and one reason alone, your failure to "man-up" because you are "weak and stupid"." <br /><br />You are a genius.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-19589693967080013922010-05-04T18:04:45.791-07:002010-05-04T18:04:45.791-07:00I most certainly don't hate men. I revel in be...I most certainly don't hate men. I revel in being male and enjoy the company of my male friends. I don't even hatte weak men but I do hold them in contempt. <br /><br />I do not blame unequal representation under the law directly on men. I do however believe men are responsible for how they deal with such things. I do think that in the face of that "manning up" is the appropriate response. Supporting ones children regardless of the actions of the mother or the fairness of the law is one such example ofbeing a man.<br /><br />Also I am not sure how you think paying child support constitutes having "sole responsibility" for supporting a child. Of the women I know who recieve child support it barely constitutes half of the expense of raising a child. Are you claiming that a man who loses custody has no obligation to his offspring? As a father the vast majority of my income goes to supporting my children. I do have the advantage that some of this also goes to my own support but I also contribute far more than I would be ordered to pay were I divorced.<br /><br />The single mothers I know both work full time jobs, keep up a home, care for the children and when they get their child support it is significantly less than what they contribute. The father on the other hand has only to contribute a portion of his earnings and have no other responsibility unless he chooses it.<br /><br />Sounds to me like the woman is getting the short end of the stick. Obviously individual cases vary and some men may well pay the bulk of their childs support but that is not the norm. Also under law a father can get custody, admittedly in practice it is harder but not impossible I have a good friend who has custody and his wife was not even a bad mother. In fact she and he have a good relationship and work together for the benefit of the children.<br /><br />As to title nine all that is required for complance are the following:<br /><br />Prong one - Providing athletic participation opportunities that are substantially proportionate to the student enrollment, OR<br /> <br />Prong two - Demonstrate a continual expansion of athletic opportunities for the underrepresented sex, OR <br /><br />Prong three - Full and effective accommodation of the interest and ability of underrepresented sex<br /><br />Where is this discriminatory against men? It requires equal participation for both genders in institutions recieving federal funding. I have seen some problems in implementation but it is not facially discriminatory and in fact serves to alieve discrimination.<br /><br />As a wrestling fan and father of a wrestler the implimentation does disturb me but that is more of a consequence of administrators undervaluing the sport rather than title IX specifically. Also that may be changing because the interest by girls in the sport is rapidly increasing. Nearly a quarter of the elementary and a fith of the middle school wrestlers in my area are female. Participation at the high school level is still small but growing. In time wrestling may well become a gender nuetral sport. Either through having both male and female teams or by having unisex teams. I would regard either to be a good thing especially since some of the girls are capable of competing with the boys in their weight class.<br /><br />As to the non athletic components of title IX I can not see any discriminatory impact.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-51578054359100990082010-05-04T18:02:12.953-07:002010-05-04T18:02:12.953-07:00You would refuse to support your child, because a ...You would refuse to support your child, because a court gave custody to the mother? <br /><br />Yes, child support is actually woman support alimony. Second fatherhood is not something that can be turned into money. 4 days a month is the standard "visitation" time and I do not call this meaningful contact with the child.<br /><br />It is best for men whose family has divorced them to start another family. They should do this if they are lucky enough to evade from being forced to support the strong independent woman who left them and took their child. <br /><br />Men loose meaningful contact with their children 90% of the time. <br /><br /><br /><br />YOU SAY: <br />"Also unless the man is an abusive drunk few fathers are denied "meaningful contact" with their children."<br /><br />Sir what planet do you live on? Are you out of your mind? 90% of men loose meaningful contact with their children and are reduced to the role of "visitor" in the lives of their child.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-8140744031811798982010-05-04T15:49:39.830-07:002010-05-04T15:49:39.830-07:00For someone who claims to not hate women and to wa...For someone who claims to not hate women and to want to define things objectively you are doing a very bad job of conveying that.<br /><br />You blanketly state that women are doing these things, yet that is obviously false. It may be true that some women do these things and some women want these things but that is a far cry from claiming all or even most are. As I said we are obviously dealing with very different groups of women.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-46080710066012398622010-05-04T15:47:02.035-07:002010-05-04T15:47:02.035-07:00Anyone who committs suicide male or female is weak...Anyone who committs suicide male or female is weak and stupid, end of story. The one exception are profound mental illnesses but you don't blame those on your imagined matriarchy do you?<br /><br />Likewise those who refuse to vote are weak and stupid. Admittedly voting often has minimal impact, but that does not change the fact that making the best vote you can is the only way you can claim to have any rights or value in society. If you don't vote shut up.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-66780615307759443012010-05-04T15:42:15.990-07:002010-05-04T15:42:15.990-07:00You would refuse to support your child, because a ...You would refuse to support your child, because a court gave custody to the mother? It is clear you do not have children. If you did and are not a sociopath then you would choose to support your own children. Calling it hers may serve to justify your dead beat deriliction but saying so would only delude yourself and make you feel better but it would not make you any less of a vermin.<br /><br />Also unless the man is an abusive drunk few fathers are denied "meaningful contact" with their children. Most of the divorced men I know have at minimum regular and generous visitation. Three have joint custody and one has sole custody with the wife having visitation. Of course they all support and care about their children.Rykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16424545934239146403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-35358332158921071232010-05-04T01:40:37.418-07:002010-05-04T01:40:37.418-07:00YOU SAY: "Also protecting women is not an adm...YOU SAY: "Also protecting women is not an admirable goal if by doing so you force them into a situation where they can not protect themselves. Creating a dependancy is in fact a very exploitive thing to do."<br /><br />Personally, I don't care how it's done. I really don't care if they institute more women first laws. I don't care how women have to handicap men as long as they can be independent and self supporting... <br /><br />I am not sure of women are capable of supporting themselves.. When a woman leaves a man in divorce she should support herself financially and if she is given ownership over the body, life and welfare of "her" child she should support the child as well... <br /><br />If she can't afford to support the child then it is only rightful that the child be shared with the father. <br /><br />It is only rightful that the child have meaningful contact with the father. <br /><br />If I have a family someday I will not have my fatherhood turned into a capitalized liability. If the woman I am involved with divorces her family I will not support her or "her" child in a provider role. <br /><br />I am prepared to defend the right to my body and the fruits of it's labor with my life....Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-61714332748839988772010-05-04T01:23:41.566-07:002010-05-04T01:23:41.566-07:00"Men are perfectly capable of achieving despi..."Men are perfectly capable of achieving despite any gender bias against them."<br /><br /> LOL, you are a male aren't you. You are in denial sir. Gender biased laws are wrong. PERIOD.<br /><br />"I am fully aware of my rights. Women have no power that we do not choose to give them."<br /><br />You sound like the male praying mantis if he could talk. He as well sells out his bodily sovereignty for the opportunity to reproduce... You really think that the choice to forfeit equal protections and representation under law is something that is worth it do you...?<br /><br />You really think you are in control don't you. Wait until the family matriarch decides to take your beloved children away from you and forces you to financially support her through forced labor. Then you will see that women are not self supporting and independent. You will see that they still rely on men to support them. You will see that men bear the liabilities for female "choices".<br /><br /><br /><br />"If men are not voting and committing suicide that is a sign that they are weak and stupid."<br /><br />You are in denial that there is an issue here that needs to be understood and addressed. Calling men weak and stupid will not solve the problem. Hating men as you do will not solve the problem. You sound like a feminist. <br /><br /> "As to child support, perhaps men should be more careful about who they father children with."<br /><br /> WOW, I am continually blown away by your insistence that all male problems, injustices, unequal representation under law etc are part of being a man and if bad things come of it that this is a result of "failing to man-up".Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-74280678725733396142010-05-04T01:08:28.683-07:002010-05-04T01:08:28.683-07:00YOU SAY: "just because it is favring women is...YOU SAY: "just because it is favring women is in no way indicative that women are voracious and against men and it is certainly no indicator of impending matriarchy."<br /><br />Just so you know, I define matriarchy as a female centered social system where the role men is expendable and disposable by legislation. I define it as the associated legislative support construct that creates this reality.<br /><br />Sir you seem to be in denial that women have taken away your rights to your body and the fruits of its labor and that of the right of fatherhood to your own children...<br /><br /> Women are not independent and self supporting like they promised, they simply created no-fault divorce and made male obligations transferable to them outside of marriage along with default ownership of children.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-39643363759967858532010-05-04T01:03:26.133-07:002010-05-04T01:03:26.133-07:00YOU SAY: "If men are not voting and committin...YOU SAY: "If men are not voting and committing suicide that is a sign that they are weak and stupid"<br /><br /> I'm sorry sir but I just can't continue to have a conversation with you if you are not making objective logical statements using reason. To explain away such social problems by calling men weak and stupid is just plain misandry. You sound like a feminist.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.com