tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post8756994757663189729..comments2023-10-31T05:38:51.597-07:00Comments on Rebuking Feminism: Feminism and the Communist RevolutionBwechttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-72158411719511369632012-10-22T20:33:02.741-07:002012-10-22T20:33:02.741-07:00DANNY BOY ABRAMS ON SEX SUPERIORITY
Dan Abrams, t...DANNY BOY ABRAMS ON SEX SUPERIORITY<br /><br />Dan Abrams, the legal analyst of NBC, is writing a book called “Man Down, How Women Are Better At…” One can just imagine the reaction were Dan Abrams to write a book entitled “Blacks Down, How Whites Are Better At…” The reaction would be instantaneous. The book would be labeled racist, vile and untrue by definition. The facts on white superiority would count for nothing. One cannot believe that whites are superior to blacks but one can believe that women are superior to men. We may be sure that Dan Abrams does not discuss Alcohol Prohibition in his paean of praise to female superiority. The fact that women were the driving force behind the most disastrous social reform movement in American history might present difficulties for Mr. Abrams contrived thesis. Thus, we may be sure that he deletes it. Dan Abrams shall also be predictably silent on how women are treated in his real country called Israel. Thus, “Danny Boy” shall not be describing how women in Israeli busses are required to ride in the rear as the bus passes through Orthodox neighborhoods. Nor shall he discuss the vast Jewish controlled sex slave trade and the thousands of women kidnapped to the Tel Aviv brothels each year. “Danny Boy” may mention Israel’s 1953 law granting women full civic, political and economic rights. But, if so, he shall surely delete the exception for family law and what it entails. Thus, “Danny Boy” shall not mention that a wife cannot get a divorce without her husband’s consent or that a wife whose husband dies while she is still childless must offer herself in marriage to his bother – or buy her release through forfeiture of the community property. Still less shall he mention that if a woman has a child born from adultery the child shall be termed a mamzerim, a bastard, and shall be forbidden to marry, except to another bastard. A woman whose husband goes missing in war or who otherwise disappears cannot remarry unless she has absolute proof of his death. Abortion, in Israel, is a state decision, not a personal decision. A Jewess must obtain government permission for an abortion. The decision shall be made based on the state’s need for more Jewish babies and the danger of a higher Arab birth rate, counterbalanced by the woman’s financial ability to care for the child. Traditionally, in Israel, a woman’s testimony has no standing in family law court. In the Orthodox synagogues until recently a woman could not qualify for the minyam, the minimum number of Jews necessary to form a quorum. Only male Jews so qualify. The free love, no-fault divorce system that has caused so much grief in the United States is virtually unknown in Israel. Divorce has been severely restricted in the Zionist state. When divorce does occur, it is exclusively under the control of the religious authorities, not the civil authorities. There is no civil divorce in Israel.<br /><br />“Danny Boy” Abrams knows these facts on his real country perfectly. But like the deceased Jewish Communist Ashley Montagu/Israel Ehrenberg who wrote “The Natural Superiority of Women” back in the 1960’s, he is not about to mention them as he lies through his teeth.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-12785957781627387982012-10-22T20:20:48.094-07:002012-10-22T20:20:48.094-07:00George Gilder published a book in the 1960's c...George Gilder published a book in the 1960's called "Sexual Suicide". He forecast quite accurately that if women were given economic equality plus sexual superiority we would have all the prolems occuring today. The book is still worth reading.<br /><br />Anonymous2Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-36312160940112286892012-05-19T09:56:35.807-07:002012-05-19T09:56:35.807-07:00Wow so good post i like it so much and i hoipe to ...Wow so good post i like it so much and i hoipe to visit my blog <a href="http://viewgoals.com/" rel="nofollow"> View Goals</a> and it talking about <a href="http://viewgoals.com/" rel="nofollow"> World Goals</a> <a href="http://viewgoals.com/" rel="nofollow"> ViewGoals.Com </a> thanks again ,,,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-18827177528011675942012-05-02T01:05:07.800-07:002012-05-02T01:05:07.800-07:00So good topic really i like any post talking about...So good topic really i like any post talking about <a href="http://www.ancientgreece.me/" rel="nofollow"> Ancient Greece </a> but i want to say thing to u Ancient Greece not that only ... you can see in Ancient Greece <a href="http://www.ancientgreece.me/" rel="nofollow"> Ancient Greece Gods</a> and more , you shall search in Google and Wikipedia about that .... thanks a gain ,,,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-77571635384955473722012-04-11T19:40:15.073-07:002012-04-11T19:40:15.073-07:00Fellow Men,
The problems of feminism are numerous...Fellow Men,<br /><br />The problems of feminism are numerous and blatant.<br /><br />But you as a Man can do something personal and meaningful to change that in your own life.<br /><br />Go to The Manhood Academy at<br />www.manhood101.com<br /><br />There is a free ebook, a real masterpiece of writing which sits on my bookshelf along with the classics.<br /><br />Read it if you're a man and you will not be disappointed in the wisdom it communicates to you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-23298383220887748192010-11-01T08:59:23.513-07:002010-11-01T08:59:23.513-07:00feminism destroys children, men, women, families, ...feminism destroys children, men, women, families, feminism violates universal human rights and constitutional rights asif they are another species (coming from venus!), feminism is a sever mind-control-illne$$, sociopathic inhuman antisocial and destructive, worse than racism and destroys the worldAdVaderhttp://gescheidenvaders.multiply.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-51617145364845039672010-04-15T22:42:25.591-07:002010-04-15T22:42:25.591-07:00Hello Anon, YOU SAY: "For African American wo...Hello Anon, YOU SAY: "For African American women in their late teen and early twenties, the unemployment and incarceration rates for African American males make it very difficult for them to fine 'marriageable' men."<br /><br /><br />This is very true and the black community is a perfect example of what the rest of the social structure is headed for.. Your statement rings true in that I believe the artificial restraints placed on males through women first social policies etc serve to hinder male productive incentive thus leading to high unemployment "suspended adolescence" of males and high incarceration rates.<br /><br />There were no black women first laws in your community but the same result was accomplished by single mother welfare policies.<br /><br />It is my contention that if a "resource transferability" construct is implemented as is currently the case with Alimony and Child Support i.e. forced male resource provision to the female outside of marriage along with what I call "government husbandry" or "welfare" the same results in mated pair bond formation will take place in the rest of the social construct outside the black community...This is indeed currently and increasingly the case....<br /><br />This is of grave concern to me..<br /><br />If I recall 70% of all black households are single mother households... I expect the same to happen in the rest of our social structure if we do not protect equal representation for males by law and thus protect the competitive echelon among males along with equal opportunity for competitive advantage among males to compete...<br /><br />This model is also supported when you look at the time in which welfare was implemented in the black community, it infact took place during the time in which you specified.<br /><br />I have no doubt that if we do not change our marriage and family law along with other social policies the end results will continue to get worse...Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-53607953063502489752010-03-09T02:36:10.803-08:002010-03-09T02:36:10.803-08:00Some of the ideas attributed to Marxism in the art...Some of the ideas attributed to Marxism in the article did not in themselves seem unattractive. May be the consequences where not up to expectation but people a 100 years ago were not to know that. <br /><br />Also some of the comments ( I read them all) where very candid and I think valid. Certainly the thoughts that they expressed resonate with the way I feel.<br /><br />I find it hard to be optimistic in any way what-so-ever. That social evil (whatever that might be) will develop is not the point. For me the point is that the tide has been set and the force of history put in motion. Only when there has been a complete working through of all that is in place now will there then be the possibility of any improvement. These are my thoughts anyway. I don't seek to convince others of their merit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-8822679504078004832010-02-22T05:58:34.699-08:002010-02-22T05:58:34.699-08:00My concern is the trend of single motherhood as a ...My concern is the trend of single motherhood as a deliberate choice, having not found a "suitable" man. This will only lead to a "women's and children's issue" where more tax dollars will be demanded for childcare, children's healthcare, education, and so forth. The women will outvote the men, as there are more of them in sheer numbers, and many more men than women made ineligible to vote on account of the increasing amount of felonies males will invariably be committing by this time. Not to mention men in the U.S. have been dropping out of civic life on multiple levels but more specifically voter participation. <br /><br /> The end result will be that more tax dollars will go towards caring for children and accommodating single mothers. I to see no place for men in the family with this paradigm <br /><br />In short, men will be reduced to thralldom.<br /><br />This can't be good for either sex. And the backlash will not be pretty.Marionoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-44147700664001442132010-02-22T05:27:56.054-08:002010-02-22T05:27:56.054-08:00Women used to get married for financial security, ...Women used to get married for financial security, and to have a family. Men got married because that was what their mate wanted, and because it was a point of pride to be the alpha male. Men have never had a financial incentive to marry, and still don't when we look at the cost of raising a familiy, and the probability and cost of divorce.<br /><br />The incentives for women have changed to the point where marrying a man is strictly a question of whether he's useful enough to warrant the effort (most of us aren't, girls). The financial benefits are disappearing with men's declining earning potential, and the social stigma of single motherhood just isn't there. For a man, sex is no easier to get if married, disposable income is certain to fall, and he's signing up for a contract which obligates him to decades of alimony and child support whenever the wife chooses to end it. Plus he's no longer allowed to even pretend he's in charge, and the kids that he may want can be taken away from him at any time by the wife and her lawyer. No man with any sense will sign up for marriage today unless he is besotted with a woman who demands it.<br /><br />Men will continue to get married because their women want it, but only those men with superior earning power and useful house skills will be invited to the party. They will be divorced when their usefulness declines. Women, as always, will mourn the dirth of marriage-worthy men, but that pool will continue to shrink. When demand for marrige-worthy men greatly exceeds supply, I predict the return of polygamy, multiple women with children cohabiting with one man. With the number of unmarried men steadily increasing, I predict the continued growth of the single male subculture, increasingly divergent and out of touch with the marriage/family subculture. Perhaps there will be single male ghettos, filled with small apartments, strip clubs and sports bars. A brave new world indeed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-91748589415045881592010-02-22T03:34:52.054-08:002010-02-22T03:34:52.054-08:00That fact is that African American women have been...That fact is that African American women have been in the position of making more than their male counterparts for over a generation. As far back as the early 1960's African American women were going to college in higher numbers than African American males. <br /><br />For African American women in their late teen and early twenties, the unemployment and incarceration rates for African American males make it very difficult for them to fine 'marriageable' men.<br /><br />Ebony, a magazine focused primarily on African American women has for over 30 years periodically ran stories about black female executives happily married to black males that have 'blue collar' jobs or in some other way are not the woman's social equal on a professional level.This is a rarity though. Fatherless children, single mothers and few if ever married couples was the result. The explosion of the welfare state did not help repair our families though.<br /><br /><br />It is okay, even desirable, to date and marry a man of a lower professional social status but does it happen?<br /><br />Perhaps, but the economic trends, the ones that have impacted African American men for 30 years and is only starting to catch up with the rest of the country, is that working class males in this country have become increasing squeezed out and marginalized in our economy. <br /><br />From the top, the once well paying manufacturing jobs are being systematically shipped overseas or de-unionized with increasing lower benefits, salary and job security. <br /><br />From the bottom, unchecked illegal immigration is eliminating opportunities in the non-skilled working sector to make a ‘living wage’. So-called ‘undocumented’ aliens can afford to work for lower wages because often the families they support are in countries where the cost of living is substantially lower. Also, employers often view (correctly for the most part) as workers who will not actively lobby for their rights because of the real fear of deportation. These trends hit African American men first because they tended to occupy those marginal jobs in higher proportions.<br /><br />So to you white women who are facing the issue of unequal professional status, I suggest you look at the experience of African American professional women. If you like what you see, keep moving forward. If you start to worry about the broader implications of what is going on, you might want to start with the economy first.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-77984802193521428962010-02-22T03:10:50.694-08:002010-02-22T03:10:50.694-08:00In an equitable world, women would have been marry...In an equitable world, women would have been marrying men who earned less, for years or decades. The idea that it's news in 2010 exposes a hidden problem in women's expectations, called "hypergamy." (Yep, I'm trained as an anthropologist.)<br /><br />Hypergamous marriage is a long-standing norm in which women tend to marry men who are a little wealthier, smarter, stronger, etc, getting a socioeconomic upgrade as well as a life partner. As women wanted more participation in the workforce, they didn't systematically abandon their hypergamous expectations, and still haven't. (Don't remember seeing a lot of articles in Ms magazine advising women to set aside the idea of a higher-earning spouse--Gloria Steinem didn't.)<br /><br />However, in the socioeconomic pyramid, as more and more women attain higher levels, the "point of the pyramid" does not contain enough males to provide hypergamous partners for all. "Having it all" is the mantra of the women's movement, remember?<br /><br />Women setting aside their insistence on higher-earning males should have been news in 1970. That it took forty years to understand that "equality" doesn't mean "I get an upgrade in every dimension" is really the headline here. The real news is that it's taken forty years or so for the obvious implications of career mobility to sink in.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-37769670297026383782010-02-21T23:45:31.479-08:002010-02-21T23:45:31.479-08:00Furthermore do you support the idea that female su...Furthermore do you support the idea that female supremacy is being forcefully implemented through "women first" laws, essentially in an attempt to handicap men from producing?<br /><br /> Does the Matriarchy approve of equal protection under law and thus equal opportunity?Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-42679312071802792162010-02-21T23:40:49.679-08:002010-02-21T23:40:49.679-08:00Can you explain to me the central tenets of the fa...Can you explain to me the central tenets of the family under this Matriarchy of which you speak?<br /><br />Again...please illiterate upon the formation of family in your Matriarchy.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-944006500924723832010-02-21T23:37:29.392-08:002010-02-21T23:37:29.392-08:00And how is it that you plan to free men now that &...And how is it that you plan to free men now that "western Femnism is working off its own steam and Matriarchy is ploughing full-steam ahead."?<br /><br /> Do you plan to free men of their provider role or not? What role do you expect men to play in the family?<br /><br />You say: "It's ironic to note that at the end of the USSR in 1989, after decades of Soviet Communism, society was fairly distinctly Patriarchal. Far from disintegrating, the nuclear family remained firmly established"<br /><br />Actually you need to be corrected, the presence of a man in the home was no longer seen as obligatory.<br /><br /> Ok, and now, as you can see from the data on my blog, the patriarchal family is deteriorating at a rapid pace. <br /><br />What role will men play in the family upon the institution of Matriarchy of which you speak?<br /><br /> Your comment is rather simplistic. When I remove the articulate veneer your statement yields an opinion but nothing to work with here..Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-74013993209494679382010-02-21T20:44:27.641-08:002010-02-21T20:44:27.641-08:00Communism was an early attempt at Feminism/Matriar...Communism was an early attempt at Feminism/Matriarchy but for a variety of reasons it failed. The new incarnation, however (led by the West) will not fail.<br /><br />Past performance does not indicate future performance.<br /><br />The parallels between Communist rhetoric and Western Feminist rhetoric are interesting, but ultmiately we have to see that it doesn't matter that much, as Western Femnism is working off its own steam and Matriarchy is ploughing full-steam ahead.<br /><br />It's ironic to note that at the end of the USSR in 1989, after decades of Soviet Communism, society was fairly distinctly Patriarchal. Far from disintegrating, the nuclear family remained firmly established. Bourgeouis (or what used to be regarded as bourgeouis, i.e. traditional) sexality and moral standards were intact.<br /><br />We always have to remember this, when we paint "Red Communism" - old school Communism - as a great villain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com