tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post5008447874399092685..comments2023-10-31T05:38:51.597-07:00Comments on Rebuking Feminism: Debate With A Female SupremacistBwechttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-47493410975128034692019-07-19T02:49:01.390-07:002019-07-19T02:49:01.390-07:00These are powerful arguments & the sheer predi...These are powerful arguments & the sheer predictability of feminist response to a number of thoughtful, rational and logically sound claims further reinforces the author's points. <br /><br />When the feminist can't compete on an intellectual level, they predictably as usual and expectedly resort to attacks on the author's character and his gender. Furthermore, lacking any substantive and well formed counter-points, the majority of the response, AS USUAL then degrades to a number of completely unrelated claims with no substantive proof for the majority of them intermixed with a variety of petty insults that could only come from someone who is cognitively deficient compared to the people which they attack. <br /><br />Not only have the feminists failed to defend the merits of their ideas, they then finally resort to a series of attacks that drive the conversation further and further away from a rational discussion, which sadly reflects incredibly poorly on not just their position and viewpoint, but ultimately further reduces the perception of competence of not just the attacker but the group identity which they purport to defend ends up looking more and more inadequate not just in the eyes of their peers, but of any intellectually capable onlooker. <br /><br />The feminist responses thus far have been absolutely pathetic, as expected, as USUAL.zvonimir knoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-54284342699610639632014-01-15T16:50:21.899-08:002014-01-15T16:50:21.899-08:00Anonymous said...
"The Y chromosome carr... Anonymous said...<br /><br /> "The Y chromosome carries only gender information -- determining sex for the most part. The Y chromosme has less than 80 genes on it because all it is needed for is the determination of sex. The X chromosome, however, carries around 1,500 genetic markers, all responsible for attributes such as height, hair color, and even color-blindness (which is more common in men than women).<br /><br /> How does it feel to be diminished and minimalized by the opposite sex? Now you know how we have felt for the past several thousand years."<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyonization<br /><br />You were saying?Nacho Bidnasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-20399976084302822282013-09-18T09:09:57.466-07:002013-09-18T09:09:57.466-07:00If either sex WAS superior the other would be elim...If either sex WAS superior the other would be eliminated and replaced with a better version to even it out -.- species aren't evolved for infighting and you're all suggesting that its the case? Or you botherers are saying that this thing decided one was better? Yeah you all clearly thought this out -.- go back in your caves and fight while I go with my equal girlfriend and be equal like normal people and not be Luddites and simpletons festering in ancient arguments long past usefulness Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04519772189220598028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-12737285182749531852012-05-02T19:23:19.968-07:002012-05-02T19:23:19.968-07:00From Andrea Bennet: As an anthropologist and commu...From Andrea Bennet: As an anthropologist and communication grad student who carries a 3.89 GPA, I just have to say that on a rhetorical level, your argument is full of holes and false logic. If you are going to argue such a contentious point, some education may be in order.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-85571581688251183682012-05-02T19:11:38.744-07:002012-05-02T19:11:38.744-07:00The Y chromosome carries only gender information -...The Y chromosome carries only gender information -- determining sex for the most part. The Y chromosme has less than 80 genes on it because all it is needed for is the determination of sex. The X chromosome, however, carries around 1,500 genetic markers, all responsible for attributes such as height, hair color, and even color-blindness (which is more common in men than women).<br /><br />How does it feel to be diminished and minimalized by the opposite sex? Now you know how we have felt for the past several thousand years.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-75054854710783128582011-10-08T15:09:42.709-07:002011-10-08T15:09:42.709-07:00"If you mean that part of a wifes expected re..."If you mean that part of a wifes expected reciprocal duty to her husband was to be sexually available to him even when one is not in the mood for it yes, this was expected of wives."<br /><br />Sex shouldn't be an obligation or a "duty." It should be something both parties want to do. <br /><br />If you don't understand what I'm saying, imagine the situation is reversed: that the male's duty/obligation is to have an object rammed up his ass every day regardless of whether he's into it or not. <br /><br />Sorry, but when sex is an obligation or a duty, it's not consensual and that makes it rape.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-89888164508993345602011-04-15T10:46:42.678-07:002011-04-15T10:46:42.678-07:00Too bad that Anonymous never managed to acquire an...Too bad that Anonymous never managed to acquire an education, She is clearly out of her league. Even a smal dose of "patriarchal liner thinking" (a.k.a. logic) would help her to make some sense.<br /><br />Unfortunately, all she has at her disposal are ad-hominem slurs, the mark of an inferior intellect and clearly insufficient to make her case, whatever than may be. I don't think she has that figured out yet.<br /><br />In the absence of logic, unstructured and unprincipled ideas turn to chaotic mush.<br /><br />It is for that reason that the truth always easily trumps a feminist argument.<br /><br />No wonder that Anonymous feels safe by hiding behind her anonymity. No reasonable and honest woman would want to admit to spouting nonsense.Walterhttp://blog.fathersforlife.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-31970202701520971402011-02-22T05:11:29.945-08:002011-02-22T05:11:29.945-08:00More on anti-suffrage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...More on anti-suffrage <br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti_suffrage<br /><br />Also voting was considered a family decision. Men and women were not separate socio-political and socio-economic classes in conflict with each other as we are now. It was one vote per family and men were expected to be the public representative of the family.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-3883849634585449372011-02-22T05:05:55.269-08:002011-02-22T05:05:55.269-08:00"You beat us, and raped us in the name of &qu..."You beat us, and raped us in the name of "marital relations"<br /><br /> Your idea that rape was a common form of marital relations is absurd. If you mean that part of a wifes expected reciprocal duty to her husband was to be sexually available to him even when one is not in the mood for it yes, this was expected of wives.<br /><br /> JUST LIKE YOU, MEN HAVE A SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE CYCLE. Our bodies need to release at regular intervals. Masturbation and spilling ones seed alone and onto the ground was considered vile. <br /><br />"You deprived us of the right to vote."<br /><br /> Actually Anti-Suffragism was a political movement composed mainly of women.<br /><br />Men never denied women the right to vote....they never asked for it and when they did many women were against it..not men. Furthermore non land owning men could not vote either. Only those who owned land had the right to vote. Men gained suffrage and women gained it sometime later...when they asked for it. <br /><br /> "You prostituted us and you even murdered us."<br /><br /> Murder of ones husband or wife has always been a capitol offense under law. As far as prostitution goes would you like to know the fate of young lower class men??? You prostitute yourselves so don't give me that argument. Try being conscripted as cannon fodder in war so men can provide you the territory and resources you demand we provide to you.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-83811426030321326352011-02-22T05:05:30.926-08:002011-02-22T05:05:30.926-08:00"YOUR LEGAL PROPERTY. You deprived us, women,..."YOUR LEGAL PROPERTY. You deprived us, women, of the right to divorce, own property, get custody of our children, denied us access to education and high paying jobs to support ourselves, legally took any wages we did manage to earn away from us. You beat us, and raped us in the name of "marital relations". You deprived us of the right to vote. You prostituted us and you even murdered us."<br /><br />I hate feminist revisionist history. It is so tedious to go though and debunk the feminist version of the social history of women and gender relations. I really need to sit down and put all the facts I've gathered together for an article.<br /><br /> First of all women were not kept tied up like dogs. Chivalry, reverence and elevation of women was common. Jan 5, 1643 was the first recorded divorce in the American colonies. In the first record of a legal divorce in the American colonies. Anne Clarke of the Massachusetts Bay Colony is granted a divorce from her absent and adulterous husband.<br /><br /> You see, adultery along with domestic violence was forbidden. Legislation was enacted in the American colonies that outlawed domestic violence in 1641. It was not common for women to be beaten by their husbands. Women didn't walk around the town square bruised, injured with black eyes and broken bones.<br /><br /> Yes, husbands were considered the head of the household and solely responsible for the welfare and wellbeing of his wife and children. Men were expected to be the religious and spiritual leaders of their family as well. You come from a very sick place lady and your view on the world is entirely warped. <br /><br />Upon owning property women and children were considered the core of society and as such inheritance was passed down to male offspring. A male with resources had a good chance of being a suitor to a woman who would accept his devotion in marriage. Men must work and provide money and all the needs and lifestyle he could possibly afford her and his children. <br /><br /> "denied us access to education and high paying jobs to support ourselves"<br /><br /> Women have attended schooling since the very founding of the American colonies onward. There was no such thing as "high paying jobs". We were largely an agrarian society until the Industrial Revolution. I suppose we could have asked women to do this work but I'm sure most thought it improper for a woman to slave her ass off with arduous and intense muscular labor.<br /><br /> "Legally took any wages we did manage to earn away from us."<br /><br /> Family income was always shared. Yes, the man was the one expected to make financial decisions for his family. There were no products, no major amenities NO CONSUMER CULTURE FILLED WITH GOODIES OF ALL KINDS. <br /><br /> We are talking money spent for to provide for the basic necessities of the family. There was no strong and affluent middle class.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-90972794863927744172011-02-17T16:46:40.081-08:002011-02-17T16:46:40.081-08:00"American feminists are disgusting - everybod..."American feminists are disgusting - everybody knows that"<br /><br />Ah, mail order bride alert! That would certainly explain a lot. It's not unusual for those women to have their kids taken away by abusive losers who blame all American women because they couldn't get laid in their own country. Don't bother denying it! That "American" written in such distaste with "feminists" is a dead give away.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-74141208339194552822011-02-17T16:36:51.127-08:002011-02-17T16:36:51.127-08:00"OUCH! Who are you referring to because THOSE..."OUCH! Who are you referring to because THOSE GUYS are DEAD?!"<br /><br />Well, your alive, aren't you? By agreeing with the ideas on this blog, your just as bad if not worse than the dead guys. The only difference is that the laws no longer make women your property. It pisses you guys off that you no longer have the same rights as grandpa. That's the real reason why your so against feminism, and if given a chance, you would gladly roll back any rights that women have gained. <br /><br />"American feminists are disgusting - everybody knows that - so go show off your "manginas" somewhere else 'cause I have custody of MY YOUNG CHILDREN not only by legal decree but by their own choice!"<br /><br />There is such a thing as Domestic Violence by Proxy. An abusive husband gains custody of said kids, and threatens the children with violence if they show any love or preference for mommy. The fact that you describe your kids as "young children" really raises red flags for me. Those are the most vulnerable to the tactics of abusive husbands/fathers. So, your bragging about having custody doesn't mean shit to me. Who knows how you got it? I'm not going to believe anything you say. Besides, you probably have some girlfriend, or second wife doing the real parenting while getting all the credit for having custody. Most custodial dads do that!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-68725766462945347172011-02-17T05:23:37.646-08:002011-02-17T05:23:37.646-08:00"This shit went on for millenia until fairly ..."This shit went on for millenia until fairly recently. And you guys whine because women have managed to gain rights in the last hundred years?..."<br /><br />This comment reminds me of little miss Lady Raine, what with the 10000 word stream of consciousness peppered with random all caps phrases.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-81272340595798683112011-02-17T02:12:01.601-08:002011-02-17T02:12:01.601-08:00"If making you guys pay for that empowers wom..."<i>If making you guys pay for that empowers women, so be it! As far as I'm concerned, you owe us anyway. One thing hasn't changed though. We were and still are your greatest natural resources along with our children.</i>"<br /><br />OUCH! Who are you referring to because THOSE GUYS are DEAD?!And is this your idea of an objective, historical sense of the problems we face today? I have absolutely no intention of paying YOU for the mistakes our parents might have made and as far as "childbirth", the "economy" and "progress" is concerned KNOCK YERSELVES OUT because living in such a world of increasingly depleting resources like we do about HALF the current world's population is gonna have to go anyway . . . <br /><br />We'll soon truly see who's "best adapted" to do without who and as far as our "greatest natural resources" goes Lord knows it won't be murderous abortion that we will miss the most! American feminists are disgusting - everybody knows that - so go show off your "manginas" somewhere else 'cause I have custody of MY YOUNG CHILDREN not only by legal decree but by their own choice!michaeltoohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12093406002802449759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-49735860170611904022011-02-15T16:02:10.490-08:002011-02-15T16:02:10.490-08:00"Why do male narcissists seem to lash out mos..."Why do male narcissists seem to lash out most at women?<br /><br />The researcher suggest it may be due to women’s unparalleled potential for gratifying, or frustrating, men’s narcissism. They are crucial players and even gatekeepers in men’s quests for sexual pleasure, patriarchal power and status.<br /><br />“Although narcissists may want to maintain feelings of superiority and power over all people, narcissistic heterosexual men are particularly invested in subordinating heterosexual women,” noted Dr. Keiller."<br /><br />http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/07/28/women-anger-narcissistic-men-most/16157.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-53850273947555599582011-02-15T05:38:37.685-08:002011-02-15T05:38:37.685-08:00"Larry Summers said those comments way before...<i>"Larry Summers said those comments way before he was at Harvard. "</i><br /><br />haha so that's how he got to Harvard. Come to think of it, he must've got Nancy Hopkins swooning with those words, after all he got her nauseated with some words too.<br /><br /><i>"Apparently, you don't understand. Fraternity means BROTHERHOOD genius. We saw how "liberty" and "equality" was defined through the fraternity (patriarchy), and we aren't interested."</i><br /><br />lol and women just tacked sorority onto it. The height of female intellect, for the feminists at least.<br /><br />Now we just have to pull children out of the oppressive matriarchy that they have been put through thousands of years(save for some time in Sparta). <br /><br />After all, more boys than their aging mothers have the computer skills to survive in this technological age, and so many great video game players couldn't pursue their dreams because their mothers don't allow them to play a little bit more. <br /><br />And that's because so many boys have been forced into jobs that they don't want to do, or even any job in itself in order to support their mothers(who will live mroe than they do). <br />No more.<br />They will have the freedom of non-attachment and to do whatever they want, and less risks of bodily harm due to stress and all that a job might entail. <br /><br />Women use children to meet their own emotional needs, while dumping them in child care centres to look after their own careers when that is fulfilled.<br />This psychological attachment that a woman fosters to an unknowing child; the child's sense of helplessness of not owning their own toys but had to be brought for them after lot of begging and pleading, all shall be done away with. <br /><br />Children will be granted the same rights as adults, they will hold property and be allowed to choose their own names, and in order to help them to overcome this age-old oppression and gain equality, special government departments will be propped up in due time.<br /><br />They will also vote better than their erstwhile "mothers". <br /><br />And there will be no more deaths of innocent children before childbirth.<br /><br />Say with me, "Death to matriarchy, long live freedom".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-26185832065600945472011-02-14T20:01:47.461-08:002011-02-14T20:01:47.461-08:00WOW! This is a great post! A lot of truth and info...WOW! This is a great post! A lot of truth and information here. Completely agree.<br /><br /> This really got the feminist's goat. They don't like truth very much. It gets them all flustered and red in the face. Funny how you never mentioned anything about male superiority yet women see this as some sort of power struggle. Like you said it must be gynocentric projection of their own natures.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-23444519023861118802011-02-14T16:44:15.219-08:002011-02-14T16:44:15.219-08:00"heh, who knows whether he is lying to you ga..."heh, who knows whether he is lying to you gals. <br />He gets to keep his job regardless of truth or untruth of these assertions."<br /><br />Larry Summers said those comments way before he was at Harvard. <br /><br />"There are only three things in the world that women do not understand; and they are Liberty, <br />Equality and Fraternity."<br /><br />Apparently, you don't understand. Fraternity means BROTHERHOOD genius. We saw how "liberty" and "equality" was defined through the fraternity (patriarchy), and we aren't interested.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-20450787450385968702011-02-14T16:01:56.529-08:002011-02-14T16:01:56.529-08:00"The only difference is that now we are in th...<i>"The only difference is that now we are in the driver's seat."</i><br /><br />Or rather munching on the branch on which you sit.<br /><br /><i>"So, congratulate yourselves on your superiority! <br />Once the legal barriers YOU put on us were removed, we managed to flip the situation around so fast-your heads are still spinning."</i><br /><br />Yeah, who cares about the birth control pill, we could have ripped out our child.., oops fetuses by <br />our own hand in order to become equal and then surpass men.<br /><br /><i> "We haven't quite caught up to you, but we're almost there."</i><br /><br />Like the hare and turtle story, only this time the hare has been beaten up before the race began <br />and then ordered to carry a 10kg bag in order to make the contest "fair".<br /><br /><i>"And you MRAs are running scared because you can't cope with change. It's like evolution-survival of the fittest and all that stuff!"</i><br /><br />There are only three things in the world that women do not understand; and they are Liberty, <br />Equality and Fraternity.<br /><br /><i>"In other words, only the species who adapt will survive."</i><br /><br />and of course, all that stuff.<br /><br /><i>"Those men you call Manginas will be the only survivors while the rest of you will just get voted off the island."</i><br /><br />Delusions of utopia, I wonder if that's what chick lit is like.<br /><br /><i>That's it in a nutshell!"</i><br /><br />won't you like to have one.. - Sigmund Freud.namae nankanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-39016611575400185842011-02-14T16:01:40.236-08:002011-02-14T16:01:40.236-08:00"This shit went on for millenia until fairly ...<i>"This shit went on for millenia until fairly recently.And you guys whine because women have managed to gain rights in the last hundred years?"</i><br /><br />Peddle this bullshit somewhere else.<br />Google "women in Tang dynasty" for one example, not to mention the fact that an upper class woman had infinitely better life than lower class men.<br /><br /><i>"See, this whole blog and others like it are just MRA temper tantrums because deep down your <br />afraid. You want to believe your superior to women, but in reality, YOUR INSECURE BECAUSE YOU KNOW IT ISN'T TRUE!"</i><br /><br />Yeah the caps are convincing. <br /><br /><i>"That's why you whine and cry when women have made any gains that might have outstripped men (even though you still control most of the world)."</i><br /><br />Why, thanks, the pains of this world are too much for one man to bear alone.<br /><br /><i>"Your like a bunch of little boys crying for the toys they aren't allowed to break anymore. Well, tough! We're not going backwards."</i><br /><br />You will be born as a man in the next life, enjoy, haha.<br /><br /><i>"That said, women have more than earned our share of any resources through our blood, sweat, tears, shackles, prostituted, beaten, broken, and raped bodies. If making you guys pay for that empowers women, so be it!As far as I'm concerned, you owe us anyway. One thing hasn't changed though. We were and still are your greatest natural resources along with our children."</i><br /><br />lol, indeed. You have hit the nail on the head. <br /><br /><i>"I find it amusing that you bring up Larry Summer's Harvard speech. Apparently, you don't know that Larry Summers was one of the biggest advocates for EDUCATING GIRLS AND WOMEN. He knows <br />that educated girls and women brings ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HUMAN CAPITAL TO DRIVE THAT GROWTH."</i><br /><br />He is an economist, once the opportunity cost makes it unviable to educate all people, I am sure about which sex he will choose.<br /><br /><i>"We carry the children. We provide most of the care for those children. We also invest far more <br />resources in the education and health of our children than men do. "</i><br /><br />Yeah the rise of child-care seems to be an incontrovertible testimony to the fact.<br />Why not go the whole hog and declare that motherhood is a social construct and mothers are not needed. Oh wait, where have we heard that before...<br /><br /><i>"Healthier and educated children (especially girls) brings more economic growth. It's a fact."</i><br /><br />I am trying to make love to your facts here.<br /><br /><i>"However, Larry Summers knows that women can only do this if they have some control and access to resources of their own. Larry Summers is a huge advocate for increased funding for women AND BETTER CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT. He also knows FEMALE EMPLOYMENT IS A HUGE RESOURCE FOR THE ECONOMY."</i><br /><br />heh, who knows whether he is lying to you gals. <br />He gets to keep his job regardless of truth or untruth of these assertions.<br /><br /><br /><i>"Not only do women put more of their wages toward their children than men, but women create economic growth in their own right just by having access to education and careers."</i><br /><br />Yeah well, if we removed the overconsuming mother from the household, men could/would do better too.<br /><br /><i>" Larry Summers has said along with other economists that women are the most untapped natural resource that the world has."</i><br /><br />omg he objectified women. Are you cool with it?<br /><br /><i>"That's why it's important to make it easier for women to combine motherhood and careers."</i><br /><br />Bullshit. It's important only because some idiots want to see women to achieve equality with men. <br /><br /><br /><i>"Women were and are the backbone of the economy."</i><br /><br />more like a hungry sloth that can't move from its position and yet keeps on consuming more and <br />more.namae nankanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-43089711171134918292011-02-14T05:20:19.980-08:002011-02-14T05:20:19.980-08:00It’s a fact male! We are much better than you! We ...It’s a fact male! We are much better than you! We are the center of humankind, the first sex.<br /><br />Ok boy, let’s just return to the fundamental instinct of Gynocentrism. This is something you must understand because it’s the key of every thing, the crux of it all. Since We have a greater biological value than you. Since every fucking culture on this planet agrees that We deserve that you DIE for Us. We obviously also deserve a superior status, priviledges, deference, etc. We deserve that you serve our needs first. This is a smaller sacrifice than dying after all. So, call it a ‘Princess complex’ if you want but things will remain the same: We are your biological Superiors – period- and you will never ever be able to do anything to change that! You are here for two things: moving DNA around for Women and serving Us.<br /><br />Keep it in your mind, you will NEVER be our equals, not even in your dreams. Nevertheless, I think you deserve fairness, respect and gratitude for what you are doing for Us.Julienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-56647539937313648912011-02-13T21:00:50.849-08:002011-02-13T21:00:50.849-08:00"Have you ever seen such obsession to women t..."Have you ever seen such obsession to women than in this blogger?"<br /><br />Unfortunately, yes, I have. I use to argue with another MRA who had the same views. That guy was in his early 40s, and he whined constantly about those awful American women because he couldn't find one who would marry him. He was married to a mail-order bride. What does that tell you about him? A woman chose him over starvation in the third world. Nice. Our little blogger here will look like that guy in another 20 years. As for his "intellectual capacity", what a laugh! With his views, he probably hasn't figured out how to put a stick in the termite mound yet. Chimpanzees are more intelligent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-17593665723169769442011-02-13T14:11:19.883-08:002011-02-13T14:11:19.883-08:00Not really, this topic is actually a formidable pa...Not really, this topic is actually a formidable part of social culture and society. It is a topic which is important to those with the intellectual capacity to realize this.<br /><br /> Your ad hominem attack is revealing of your understanding of these matters.Bwechttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01119025269734383315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-86804141269629840742011-02-13T12:57:01.131-08:002011-02-13T12:57:01.131-08:00Have you ever seen such obsession to women than in...Have you ever seen such obsession to women than in this blogger? How unfortunate he lives his life complaining about women. What a gigantic waste of time. It's embarrassing to see another male so preoccupied pointing his finger at women for all his unhappiness. Maybe years on end of not having what it takes to find and having a relationship with a woman has left him sour.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6348105535397009908.post-58049855427983301242011-02-12T21:42:09.112-08:002011-02-12T21:42:09.112-08:00This shit went on for millenia until fairly recent...This shit went on for millenia until fairly recently. And you guys whine because women have managed to gain rights in the last hundred years? See, this whole blog and others like it are just MRA temper tantrums because deep down your afraid. You want to believe your superior to women, but in reality, YOUR INSECURE BECAUSE YOU KNOW IT ISN'T TRUE! That's why you whine and cry when women have made any gains that might have outstripped men (even though you still control most of the world). Your like a bunch of little boys crying for the toys they aren't allowed to break anymore. Well, tough! We're not going backwards. That said, women have more than earned our share of any resources through our blood, sweat, tears, shackles, prostituted, beaten, broken, and raped bodies. If making you guys pay for that empowers women, so be it! As far as I'm concerned, you owe us anyway. One thing hasn't changed though. We were and still are your greatest natural resources along with our children. I find it amusing that you bring up Larry Summer's Harvard speech. Apparently, you don't know that Larry Summers was one of the biggest advocates for EDUCATING GIRLS AND WOMEN. He knows that educated girls and women brings ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HUMAN CAPITAL TO DRIVE THAT GROWTH. We carry the children. We provide most of the care for those children. We also invest far more resources in the education and health of our children than men do. Healthier and educated children (especially girls) brings more economic growth. It's a fact. However, Larry Summers knows that women can only do this if they have some control and access to resources of their own. Larry Summers is a huge advocate for increased funding for women AND BETTER CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT. He also knows FEMALE EMPLOYMENT IS A HUGE RESOURCE FOR THE ECONOMY. Not only do women put more of their wages toward their children than men, but women create economic growth in their own right just by having access to education and careers. Larry Summers has said along with other economists that women are the most untapped natural resource that the world has. That's why it's important to make it easier for women to combine motherhood and careers. Women were and are the backbone of the economy. The only difference is that now we are in the driver's seat. So, congratulate yourselves on your superiority! Once the legal barriers YOU put on us were removed, we managed to flip the situation around so fast-your heads are still spinning. We haven't quite caught up to you, but we're almost there. And you MRAs are running scared because you can't cope with change. It's like evolution-survival of the fittest and all that stuff! In other words, only the species who adapt will survive. Those men you call Manginas will be the only survivors while the rest of you will just get voted off the island. That's it in a nutshell!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com